Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2011 Dyno Results
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
91camaro_rs
Member


Joined: 03 Dec 2008
Posts: 1712
Location: Fox Island, Wa

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what is it that im adding?
_________________
Photobucket
'91 Camaro RS 5.7 TPI- 700r4- 3.27 posi- headers- chambered exhaust-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your making the number bigger in the VE table section that matches places where the BLM is higher than 128 in your logging. This is making your pulse-width longer, which means more fuel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
RSFreak
The other "John"


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 2946
Location: Renton

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if I modify the MAF tables, increasing the number makes the ECM think there is more air coming in or less?

Now I see why everybody swaps to the '730 ECM and SD!

_________________
'86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They swap because that Maf mazes at 255g/sec. A 350 with bolt ons pretty much hits that wall. After that you're guessing on fueling.
_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
RSFreak
The other "John"


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 2946
Location: Renton

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So tuning with VE tables is no easier than with MAF tables?
_________________
'86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

VE is easier. Less tables really.

MAF you're doing the same thing. Just the sensor is a limiting factor. Plus, when they die, they're more expensive.

Anyone figure out how to put a late model GM MAF in a turdgen?

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group