| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BigDaddyVu 12sec Club

Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1118 Location: Spokane, Wa
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:30 pm Post subject: 406 sb chevy |
|
|
What kind of "fun" things i could to make gobs of Power. Alot of older engine builders sudjust stroke a 350, destroke a 400, stroke a 400, and one sudjested this combo machine your block as if you where building a 406 buy cadillac 429 pistons and use chevy 350 rods he states " this combination of the pistons and rods will make a longer dwell on top and bottom" (stays on top dead center a lil longer to compress the air/fuel mix). and he says he hasn't had any problems with piston slap. any one else got other sudjestions? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I havent heard of that but maybe thats because I've never heard of a 429 cadillac engine. I've heard of the 500ci. and I believe like a 472 ci. caddy engine. Maybe he was talking about ford pistons? _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could go with a 348 combo.
350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.
I'd shy away from the 400 block just cause of the problems with splitting them over 500hp. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Asdfga3 wrote: | Could go with a 348 combo.
350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.
. |
That's not going to make 348 ci.
basically a 030 over 327 with special pistons and longer rods. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have dealt with some 406's before and they ran like a raped ape but they were plauged with problems all the time and they start out not as strong as a general 350 block anyways due to their siamesed cylinders. Are you looking for something relativly cost effective or just something "diffrent"? _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: | | Asdfga3 wrote: | Could go with a 348 combo.
350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.
. |
That's not going to make 348 ci.
basically a 030 over 327 with special pistons and longer rods. |
My bad. I meant a 400 block 0.30 over. 4.125 (4.155) x 3.25. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Asdfga3 wrote: | | rjmcgee wrote: | | Asdfga3 wrote: | Could go with a 348 combo.
350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.
. |
That's not going to make 348 ci.
basically a 030 over 327 with special pistons and longer rods. |
My bad. I meant a 400 block 0.30 over. 4.125 (4.155) x 3.25. |
That makes alot more sense.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, because a 350 with a 327 crank is actually just a 327....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kinda like a 305 with a 350 crank!  _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDaddyVu 12sec Club

Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1118 Location: Spokane, Wa
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
305 and 350 cranks are the same... anyways this guy also sudjested on putting on a pair of 350 head 441 and there was another set i can't remeber but anyways he stated drill out 4 steam holes on each side of the heads for better cooling beings the 400 heads are a lil low on compression. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wanarunhard Member
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 125 Location: ellensburg wa
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:38 pm Post subject: power |
|
|
| guys i know used to take a 400 small block and destroke it with a 350 crank and a big cam made lots of power they sell a kit to do it came out as a 383 and yes there was a 429 caddy in 65 had one for a long time sweet runnin motor also 472 and a 500 had em all very torquey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Huh I didn't know they made that 429 engine I guess ya learn somethin new everyday The 377 is a high windin engine and I have seen plenty of those perform nicely as well (400 destroked). _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BigDaddyVu wrote: | | 305 and 350 cranks are the same... |
Duh! Notice the little laughing face after my post?!?! <--- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't had a 400 SB, but my understanding is that it is hit or miss on reliability due to the siamesed cylinders and possible core shift of the cylinders. I don't remember the statistics but the success rate of overboring the cylinders is much lower than a 350 SB. You can put money in a block and lose it all shortly thereafter.
But if you get a reliable piece... they can run hard. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd hate to see where the crank ended up after this carnage....  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm I wonder if he was able to salvage his oil pan after that?  _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have you guys heard of changing the firing order with a different cam to make way more hp? A friend of mine said he saw it on a show on PowerBlock. Didn't quite make sense, but a big cam always makes more power...
I know you can get some sort of "flat" crank to completely change the firing order, but these guys just changed out the cam and swapped some plug wires around.
Oh ya, you can take a 2.8 block, put a 3.1 crank and rods in it, then mill down the 2.8 pistons by .060 or so to clear the valves. 11:1 compression 3.1L! V6 for the win! _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Its a 4-7 swap, basicly cyls 4 and 7 move the same, but normaly one is on exuast while the other is on an intake stoke, they just switch which is which in the cam. I don't know that it makes any more power, I think the reason for doing it, is generaly to put less stress on the crank. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: | | Its a 4-7 swap, basicly cyls 4 and 7 move the same, but normaly one is on exuast while the other is on an intake stoke, they just switch which is which in the cam. I don't know that it makes any more power, I think the reason for doing it, is generaly to put less stress on the crank. |
It is also supposed to help with cooling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|