Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

406 sb chevy
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:30 pm    Post subject: 406 sb chevy Reply with quote

What kind of "fun" things i could to make gobs of Power. Alot of older engine builders sudjust stroke a 350, destroke a 400, stroke a 400, and one sudjested this combo machine your block as if you where building a 406 buy cadillac 429 pistons and use chevy 350 rods he states " this combination of the pistons and rods will make a longer dwell on top and bottom" (stays on top dead center a lil longer to compress the air/fuel mix). and he says he hasn't had any problems with piston slap. any one else got other sudjestions?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I havent heard of that but maybe thats because I've never heard of a 429 cadillac engine. I've heard of the 500ci. and I believe like a 472 ci. caddy engine. Maybe he was talking about ford pistons?
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could go with a 348 combo.

350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.

I'd shy away from the 400 block just cause of the problems with splitting them over 500hp.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asdfga3 wrote:
Could go with a 348 combo.

350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.

.


That's not going to make 348 ci.

basically a 030 over 327 with special pistons and longer rods.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have dealt with some 406's before and they ran like a raped ape but they were plauged with problems all the time and they start out not as strong as a general 350 block anyways due to their siamesed cylinders. Are you looking for something relativly cost effective or just something "diffrent"?
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rjmcgee wrote:
Asdfga3 wrote:
Could go with a 348 combo.

350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.

.


That's not going to make 348 ci.

basically a 030 over 327 with special pistons and longer rods.

Bashy Bashy

My bad. I meant a 400 block 0.30 over. 4.125 (4.155) x 3.25.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asdfga3 wrote:
rjmcgee wrote:
Asdfga3 wrote:
Could go with a 348 combo.

350 block punched 0.30 over, with a 327 crank and 6" rods. Apparently the dwell is enough to allow 11:1 compression without race gas. It's similer to the 348 engine Chevy put in trucks before coming out with the small/big block setups.

.


That's not going to make 348 ci.

basically a 030 over 327 with special pistons and longer rods.

Bashy Bashy

My bad. I meant a 400 block 0.30 over. 4.125 (4.155) x 3.25.



That makes alot more sense. Thumbs up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, because a 350 with a 327 crank is actually just a 327.... Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RSFreak
The other "John"


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 2946
Location: Renton

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kinda like a 305 with a 350 crank! Laughing
_________________
'86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

305 and 350 cranks are the same... anyways this guy also sudjested on putting on a pair of 350 head 441 and there was another set i can't remeber but anyways he stated drill out 4 steam holes on each side of the heads for better cooling beings the 400 heads are a lil low on compression.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
wanarunhard
Member


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 125
Location: ellensburg wa


PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:38 pm    Post subject: power Reply with quote

guys i know used to take a 400 small block and destroke it with a 350 crank and a big cam made lots of power they sell a kit to do it came out as a 383 and yes there was a 429 caddy in 65 had one for a long time sweet runnin motor also 472 and a 500 had em all very torquey
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Huh I didn't know they made that 429 engine I guess ya learn somethin new everyday Laughing The 377 is a high windin engine and I have seen plenty of those perform nicely as well (400 destroked).
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
RSFreak
The other "John"


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 2946
Location: Renton

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BigDaddyVu wrote:
305 and 350 cranks are the same...


Duh! Notice the little laughing face after my post?!?! Laughing <---
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
QwkTrip
11sec Club


Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 3942
Location: Peoria, IL

1989 Pontiac Firebird

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't had a 400 SB, but my understanding is that it is hit or miss on reliability due to the siamesed cylinders and possible core shift of the cylinders. I don't remember the statistics but the success rate of overboring the cylinders is much lower than a 350 SB. You can put money in a block and lose it all shortly thereafter.

But if you get a reliable piece... they can run hard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Why me why me?

http://www.turbomustangs.com/smf/index.php?topic=68804.0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Quasi-Traction
"I have petals"


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3873
Location: stumptown

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd hate to see where the crank ended up after this carnage.... Rolling Eyes
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm I wonder if he was able to salvage his oil pan after that? Laughing
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you guys heard of changing the firing order with a different cam to make way more hp? A friend of mine said he saw it on a show on PowerBlock. Didn't quite make sense, but a big cam always makes more power...

I know you can get some sort of "flat" crank to completely change the firing order, but these guys just changed out the cam and swapped some plug wires around.




Oh ya, you can take a 2.8 block, put a 3.1 crank and rods in it, then mill down the 2.8 pistons by .060 or so to clear the valves. 11:1 compression 3.1L! V6 for the win!

_________________
E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a 4-7 swap, basicly cyls 4 and 7 move the same, but normaly one is on exuast while the other is on an intake stoke, they just switch which is which in the cam. I don't know that it makes any more power, I think the reason for doing it, is generaly to put less stress on the crank.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dewey316 wrote:
Its a 4-7 swap, basicly cyls 4 and 7 move the same, but normaly one is on exuast while the other is on an intake stoke, they just switch which is which in the cam. I don't know that it makes any more power, I think the reason for doing it, is generaly to put less stress on the crank.


It is also supposed to help with cooling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group