| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:08 am Post subject: Quadrasteer? |
|
|
How feasible would it be to think taking one of the gm half ton truck quadrasteer axles (circa 04-05) and mounting it up under a thirdgen? I'm not too familiar with them but I was thinking about this while talking to a quadrasteer owner the other day. I'm fairly certain you'd need to cut out where the back seats are, or at least a chunk, to fit the steering rack. But I guess that means a torque arm would be hard to mount. Flip the knuckles and mount the rack on the rear? Then the panhard becomes an issue...
I guess I'm just babbling.  _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
GM actually made a few demo thirdgens with rear steering. From what I remember, they flipped one on the skidpad, so they trashed the whole idea.
I remember seeing a pic of the 1 they kept on a rack and showed the rear wheels turned. _________________ 2008 GMC Z71
1991 Camaro RS Vert
1972 Jimmy 4x4
20ft Longhorn Car Hauler
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is this a passive type steering?
If so ditch that idea. Everyone I've ever known to have passive rear steering, when a component fails, they remove it. It's a bad design and bad idea. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's ECM-controlled? How are you gonna hook all that up? Also, how is this:
...going to ever physically fit under your car? Not to mention the width. And it's not like you can just whack a section out, reweld the tubes, and cut a little off of the splined ends to narrow it down, either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | Is this a passive type steering?
If so ditch that idea. Everyone I've ever known to have passive rear steering, when a component fails, they remove it. It's a bad design and bad idea. |
No it's active. From what I understand low speed steers opposite driver input for sharper turn-in and higher speed (don't know the cutoff?) steers the same as driver input for stability during lane changes and such. There's a button on the dash so I would presume you can turn it off or on.
| aaron_sK wrote: | | It's ECM-controlled? How are you gonna hook all that up? |
Yes, however I would think the control module for it uses a steering angle sensor and speed input. What else would it need?
| aaron_sK wrote: | Also, how is this:
...going to ever physically fit under your car? Not to mention the width. And it's not like you can just whack a section out, reweld the tubes, and cut a little off of the splined ends to narrow it down, either. |
I think fitting under the car wouldn't be as difficult as making room for the 2-3* steering change or whatever it does. What's a thirdgens track width?
Why couldn't you cut/shorten the tubes? Use shorter TREs. With the rack mounted to the diff you don't have to worry about bumpsteer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It took GM several years to get the software right. The hardware wasnt a big issue. It's basically all front end stuff from a 4x4. The big problem was knowing when to turn how much while keeping the vehicle stable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IROCDave Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 957 Location: Snohomish WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My wifes brother in law has a GMC 1/2 ton with it. There is no way in hell you could fit all of the hardware needed for this diff in a 3rd gen. It is amazing what GM stuffed under those trucks, it's more congested than if they had put independent suspension in it. The rear end is also about 6" wider than the regular truck rear end. If I remember correctly, this was promoted as a towing aid and the diffs were all 14 bolts. They are huge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| IROCDave wrote: | | My wifes brother in law has a GMC 1/2 ton with it. There is no way in hell you could fit all of the hardware needed for this diff in a 3rd gen. It is amazing what GM stuffed under those trucks, it's more congested than if they had put independent suspension in it. The rear end is also about 6" wider than the regular truck rear end. If I remember correctly, this was promoted as a towing aid and the diffs were all 14 bolts. They are huge. |
They're actually a modified dana60. And I agree that the dana60 stuff probably wouldn't fit very well. (the quadrasteer burban's can be picked out by the red/amber clearance lights all down the side. They're wide enough to to be required.
The experimental rear steer thirdgen used a dana44 housing and front s10 knuckles so I'm sure that could fit... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Not that I doubt you Ian, but where did you find that info? I had looked before on the internet and couldnt find anything. I remember the info from a hotrod mag, or some type of mag. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | | Not that I doubt you Ian, but where did you find that info? I had looked before on the internet and couldnt find anything. I remember the info from a hotrod mag, or some type of mag. |
What info? As much as I detest TGO, it was there.
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/fabrication/564909-aws.html
I already forgot where I found the dana60 info... I'll find it when I get back from work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This sounds like a good way to have your car torn apart for a 5-10 years.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schultzy89GTA M.R.A. (11sec Club)

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 4417 Location: Gresham, OR
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chevymad wrote: | | This sounds like a good way to have your car torn apart for a 5-10 years.. |
Naw, that is what big block swaps are for.
-Schultzy _________________ Red Sled: 89 GTA, 383, TKO, N2O
12.73 @ 109.39, 1.793 60 \ 11.794 @ 121.16, 1.62 60 (old combo) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chevymad wrote: | | This sounds like a good way to have your car torn apart for a 5-10 years.. |
I've got my eye on another thirdgen. No need to down my daily for that long. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So instead of messing with all that electrical and software crap.. you could put a steering wheel in the backseat and let Dirty Steve drive....
Or not.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah...about that... no thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DBL_TKE Member

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1505 Location: Aloha, OR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I love the quadrasteer silverados. Parking lots and U-turns are easy as pie with those trucks. It also eliminates the need for making a 3 point turn to get in on a rack. I can ask some of our techs some questions about the whole system if anyone wants. _________________ Richmond 3.73 posi| 36/24 sway bars | SLP LM2 | Koni's | Ground Control 800/200 | Y2K wheels | Dyno Don headers & Y-pipe | airfoil | BBK underdrive pulleys | Raised strut mounts | Extended ball joints | LCARB'S
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|