| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: suspension |
|
|
So im thinking about what torque arm I should be getting and I have seen several good ones out there. I like the BMR but i really am not sure if it is any better or worse then the spohn unit. Does anyone out there have one of these units and how well has it worked for them?
Also deciding on whether the 28X11.50's will fit or to just run the 28X10.50's _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you get the BMR extreme version, since the pivot point of the torque-arm is back further, it will move the rear SVSA Instant Center back further. This "should" help get more weight transfer on launch.
The spohn unit is geometricly (or pretty darned close) identical to the stocke stuff. The added strenght might be nice, and it will have a little less deflection than factory.
I would really look at the BMR unit for what you do with your car. The shorter arm can hurt braking performance, so I wouldn't suggest it to someone who is going to road-race or auto-x their car. But for a mostly drag stip car like yours, the BMR should be the better the choice.
For the tires, how well do you hook up the 10.5's ? No reason to go with more tire, unless you need more traction, and need to run lower tire pressure. If you are having spinning issues out of the hole, then go with the bigger tire, if you dead hook it, save the extra weight and stick with the smaller ones.
--John _________________
"Ever see a Motorcycle in front of a Psychiatrists Office?" Me neither |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a spohn unit. Have had it for 3 years, maybe more.
The only thing I dislike about it is the front joint pops alot. It has about 1/16" play, and when it plays, it pops. He says you just need to make sure its at xx torque (the bolt). But it still pops. _________________ 2008 GMC Z71
1991 Camaro RS Vert
1972 Jimmy 4x4
20ft Longhorn Car Hauler
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well with the et radials I have they will hook well until the gas is turned on then it's bye bye traction. Thats why I want to transfer to full slicks since the car runs to inconsistent for my liking!
I would like the BMR unit although I cannot seem to find to many installed pics. The car is pretty much all drag anymore anyhow. _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
since I have only dragged it once. I have no clue how much mine really helped.
I know I felt a difference in handling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Progressive n20 controller. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ive got the progressive controller but even on a 100 shot turned to ramp in over 3 seconds or so it still breaks them loose I have tried more or less and it still just won't hold up I would have to have it ramp in over a really long time and thats no fun lol. Thats why I figured if I changed the suspension and tires maybe I can throw the juice and dead hook it. _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I think I have decided on a few things. One is I have to get a trans blanket installed Didn't realize that 10.90 and quicker requires it. Also I think I am going to take off the lakewood bars and install UMI relocation brackets and reuse the boxed lakewood lca's to save some coin. The torque arm is the next order of business I have been looking at the BMR but I really think that with the slicks I wanna run just a UMI or a spohn unit would be just as well and install easier and make for a cleaner undercarriage.
Going with the 11.50 tire also.
After looking at my pinion angle and doing some more in depth shake down on my suspension I am wondering how in the hell I was 60' in 1.52-4 on drag radials These mods along with the 90/10's in front should move out pretty good im hopin! _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redlava Member

Joined: 02 Feb 2007 Posts: 448 Location: Bremerton
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If anything power wise you'd want a shorter one. The shorter arm means less leverage at the forward mount. Thus not having to build it as heavy to overcome the mechanical advantage. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
seems like there are a ton of opinions but the general consensus is that with a lot of power then go to a longer unit to let the chassis absorb a little bit of the energy applied on launch.
Good articles thanks!
Just got the slicks ordered over the weekend!  _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| izcain wrote: | seems like there are a ton of opinions but the general consensus is that with a lot of power then go to a longer unit to let the chassis absorb a little bit of the energy applied on launch.
Good articles thanks!
Just got the slicks ordered over the weekend!  |
SHORTER unit with lots of power. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: | | Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do? |
Opposite. The longer the bar, the more leverage. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | blue89 wrote: | | Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do? |
Opposite. The longer the bar, the more leverage. |
Longer the bar the less force on the mount to control axle. Also longer the bar the stronger the bar has to be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: | | Twilightoptics wrote: | | blue89 wrote: | | Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do? |
Opposite. The longer the bar, the more leverage. |
Longer the bar the less force on the mount to control axle. Also longer the bar the stronger the bar has to be. |
Exactly. The leverage you are thinking of Paul, is actually how Rodney is saying. The body has more leverage on the axle, so less force at the mount. But as the arm gets longer, the bending moment changes, so you have to build it stronger. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Think I'm understanding the text. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I decided that I wanted to keep the torque arm a bolt on along with a drive shaft loop and cross member all in one.
I ordered up
UMI Adjustable Torque arm with driveshaft loop
UMI LCRAB's
UMI Double Spherical rod ended LCA's
UMI Double Spherical Rod ended Panhard bar
Lakewood 90/10 Struts
Should have plenty of adjustment now
I will have to remove the driveshaft loop, and lakewood Trac bars I already have installed but this should fit the bill nicely.
Also have a few transmission parts ordered up (Didn't realize that 10.99 and lower requires a shield or blanket) I thought it was a lower time but guess not.  _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xophertony Rodeo Queen

Joined: 13 Oct 2005 Posts: 5306 Location: Portland, Oregon.
1988 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
sweet, win that money and buy more stuff.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha ya not that I think I have a shot in hell at winning anything but it's a good excuse to get the car up to snuff for coming days!  _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|