Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

suspension

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 10:58 pm    Post subject: suspension Reply with quote

So im thinking about what torque arm I should be getting and I have seen several good ones out there. I like the BMR but i really am not sure if it is any better or worse then the spohn unit. Does anyone out there have one of these units and how well has it worked for them?

Also deciding on whether the 28X11.50's will fit or to just run the 28X10.50's

_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you get the BMR extreme version, since the pivot point of the torque-arm is back further, it will move the rear SVSA Instant Center back further. This "should" help get more weight transfer on launch.

The spohn unit is geometricly (or pretty darned close) identical to the stocke stuff. The added strenght might be nice, and it will have a little less deflection than factory.

I would really look at the BMR unit for what you do with your car. The shorter arm can hurt braking performance, so I wouldn't suggest it to someone who is going to road-race or auto-x their car. But for a mostly drag stip car like yours, the BMR should be the better the choice.

For the tires, how well do you hook up the 10.5's ? No reason to go with more tire, unless you need more traction, and need to run lower tire pressure. If you are having spinning issues out of the hole, then go with the bigger tire, if you dead hook it, save the extra weight and stick with the smaller ones.

--John

_________________

"Ever see a Motorcycle in front of a Psychiatrists Office?" Me neither
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a spohn unit. Have had it for 3 years, maybe more.

The only thing I dislike about it is the front joint pops alot. It has about 1/16" play, and when it plays, it pops. He says you just need to make sure its at xx torque (the bolt). But it still pops.

_________________
2008 GMC Z71
1991 Camaro RS Vert
1972 Jimmy 4x4
20ft Longhorn Car Hauler
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well with the et radials I have they will hook well until the gas is turned on then it's bye bye traction. Thats why I want to transfer to full slicks since the car runs to inconsistent for my liking!

I would like the BMR unit although I cannot seem to find to many installed pics. The car is pretty much all drag anymore anyhow.

_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
91RSVert
Member


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2736
Location: AR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

since I have only dragged it once. I have no clue how much mine really helped.

I know I felt a difference in handling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Progressive n20 controller.
_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ive got the progressive controller but even on a 100 shot turned to ramp in over 3 seconds or so it still breaks them loose I have tried more or less and it still just won't hold up I would have to have it ramp in over a really long time and thats no fun lol. Thats why I figured if I changed the suspension and tires maybe I can throw the juice and dead hook it.
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I think I have decided on a few things. One is I have to get a trans blanket installed Embarassed Didn't realize that 10.90 and quicker requires it. Also I think I am going to take off the lakewood bars and install UMI relocation brackets and reuse the boxed lakewood lca's to save some coin. The torque arm is the next order of business I have been looking at the BMR but I really think that with the slicks I wanna run just a UMI or a spohn unit would be just as well and install easier and make for a cleaner undercarriage.

Going with the 11.50 tire also. Very Happy

After looking at my pinion angle and doing some more in depth shake down on my suspension I am wondering how in the hell I was 60' in 1.52-4 on drag radials Rolling Eyes These mods along with the 90/10's in front should move out pretty good im hopin!

_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
redlava
Member


Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 448
Location: Bremerton

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I read on TGO that a shorter torque arm helps you gain traction like dewey was saying. I also read on TGO that once you get to a certain power level you want a longer torque arm. I dunno know if this is true, but you might want to look into it.

Post 21

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/suspension-chassis/456692-torque-arm.html

Post 4

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/suspension-chassis/343349-anybody-using-jegs-short.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If anything power wise you'd want a shorter one. The shorter arm means less leverage at the forward mount. Thus not having to build it as heavy to overcome the mechanical advantage.
_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

seems like there are a ton of opinions but the general consensus is that with a lot of power then go to a longer unit to let the chassis absorb a little bit of the energy applied on launch.

Good articles thanks!

Just got the slicks ordered over the weekend! Very Happy

_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

izcain wrote:
seems like there are a ton of opinions but the general consensus is that with a lot of power then go to a longer unit to let the chassis absorb a little bit of the energy applied on launch.

Good articles thanks!

Just got the slicks ordered over the weekend! Very Happy



SHORTER unit with lots of power.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blue89 wrote:
Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do?


Opposite. The longer the bar, the more leverage.

_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Twilightoptics wrote:
blue89 wrote:
Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do?


Opposite. The longer the bar, the more leverage.


Longer the bar the less force on the mount to control axle. Also longer the bar the stronger the bar has to be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rjmcgee wrote:
Twilightoptics wrote:
blue89 wrote:
Seems like a shorter one would have more leverage on the mount point and therefor allow the axle to twist more. What else would it do?


Opposite. The longer the bar, the more leverage.


Longer the bar the less force on the mount to control axle. Also longer the bar the stronger the bar has to be.


Exactly. The leverage you are thinking of Paul, is actually how Rodney is saying. The body has more leverage on the axle, so less force at the mount. But as the arm gets longer, the bending moment changes, so you have to build it stronger.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think I'm understanding the text.
_________________
A redline a day keeps the carbon away!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I decided that I wanted to keep the torque arm a bolt on along with a drive shaft loop and cross member all in one.

I ordered up

UMI Adjustable Torque arm with driveshaft loop
UMI LCRAB's
UMI Double Spherical rod ended LCA's
UMI Double Spherical Rod ended Panhard bar
Lakewood 90/10 Struts

Should have plenty of adjustment now

I will have to remove the driveshaft loop, and lakewood Trac bars I already have installed but this should fit the bill nicely.

Also have a few transmission parts ordered up (Didn't realize that 10.99 and lower requires a shield or blanket) I thought it was a lower time but guess not. Cool

_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Xophertony
Rodeo Queen


Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 5306
Location: Portland, Oregon.

1988 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sweet, win that money and buy more stuff. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
izcain
9sec Club


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Port Angeles WA

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

haha ya not that I think I have a shot in hell at winning anything but it's a good excuse to get the car up to snuff for coming days! Very Happy
_________________

1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group