Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Turbo questions

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:49 pm    Post subject: Turbo questions Reply with quote

I'm thinking of diving into aftermarket domestic turbo.

I see that most people run MAP systems on thier turbo cars. Would it be advisable to run MAF only? Seems like you should be able to run it with the MAF upstream of the turbo and catch everything. I know this system is limited by the amount of air the MAF can effectively measure, but would work without the MAP?

_________________
E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You go MAF or MAP.

John was talking about this the other day.... why we don't see v6 cars run MAF because they should be under the 255gm/sec threshold of the MAF.

Above that you most definitely need MAP. All forced V8's most likely break that. I know I broke that theshold with a small cammed 355 N/A.

Maf is more forgiving of vacuum issues, while MAP is a little more user friendly to tune.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm thinking of stuffing a T3 on my V6 car. The stock GM maf is good for 300hp, which should be a limit for my block anyway. The only reason why I think it wouldn't work is if the engines efficiency changes at a given boost.

So say 200gm/sec at 0psi MAP uses a INJ PWM of 70% but 200gm/sec at 14psi MAP uses 90%. 200gm/sec should give you a fixed amount of fuel to go with it, right?

And if its the case of the MAF being too small, why can't you increase the size of the MAF housing and adjust for CSA in the maps?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So the newest idea is to run the MAF downstream of the turbo. That would take into account a change in air density. I would still be hp limited to how much the MAF can read.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see melted pieces in your future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well you could run the maf sensor before the turbo. not sure how accurate it would be but on the turbo forums i seen both before and after the turbo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It should be after the turbo I would think.

Also... at 255gm/sec that's the highest voltage the maf indicates. You can't add more fuel above that.

On TPI cars you can adjust the power enrichment to compensate, but you have to be in PE.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

255gm/sec should be plenty to blow into a V6. If a 350 uses the same MAF then I'd be proud if the V6 could flow that much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well look at the grand nationals specs. they run on smaller valves. i posted a turbo kit a while back from bbs designs on a turbo charged 2.8 liter v6/. they make good power. just make sure of your 60 degree crankshaft could hold it though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group