| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:29 am Post subject: ECM |
|
|
We haven't been able to get the car running good all of a sudden, weird stuff. Car has been sitting for a week or so.
Then bang we got code 52, so it looks like it’s a bad ECM.
Was running fine last week, Lets say I hope it’s the ECM.
I think we are going to buy a rebuilt one form schucks, we did this in the 87z last year after that all the problems went away.
Scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:12 am Post subject: code 52 |
|
|
I searched TGO and didn't find anyone in the past getting this code.
this is a 7730 ecm.
anyone here ever get this one??? on any ecm
thanks
scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scott,
Is that the ECM that came with the SD wiring harness? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:33 am Post subject: ecm |
|
|
Yep, both harness and computer out of a 91 iroc, straight out of the wrecking yard.
Why do you ask?
Something sound wrong? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Stock chip and calpak right? Check and make sure that the calpak is firmly in place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:22 pm Post subject: yep |
|
|
Yep, yep, and yep.
custom bin (slightly)
ran fine last week, went to start it and wow, was it missing, then code 52
I guess I could try the stock bin again, just take it off the adapter and plug it in.
scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That'd be the place to start for sure. 9 times out of 10, code 52 is an invalid calpak, improperly installed calpak, or a missing calpak. 1 out of 10 times it's a bad ECM.
Put the calpak in by itself, with the stock chip, and see if it works. If not, and the calpak is the proper calpak (i.e. V8 pak for a V , then swap the ECM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mangus wrote: | (i.e. V8 pak for a V ... |
(i.e. V8 pak for a V8 ) _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now who would have ever guessed that.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 83Z28BlackBetty wrote: | | Mangus wrote: | (i.e. V8 pak for a V ... |
(i.e. V8 pak for a V8 ) |
I was gonna mention that Pick-A-Part down in Tumwater has several '730s in stock, but they are all from 3.1Ls and so the calpaks wouldn't work. If it is the ECM, they sell 'em for $35, thats where I got mine.  _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try old chip or the stock chip. Sometimes the burn was wrong too.
Make sure none of the wires for the ECM are being shorted too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:40 am Post subject: cal pak |
|
|
I put the original chip in but nothing, will not start at all, zip..
Well that’s maybe because of VATS.
I wish there was a way to tell it was the ecm or the call pack
I have the burned chip in the adapter hooked up to the original memcal.
Iam wondering, on the back half of the call pack there is an area that has clear rubber that covers a small raised circuit board.
My programmed chip is what the ecm see's, so what is on the clear covered area that looks like a circuit board.
I thought it was only knock sensor stuff, (it reads the data from the knock sensor, 91 year 7730)
Any way Iam looking at the stock chip it says,
DELCO ANJF 4307
So far can't find any info on that number.
Will continue to search for it.
looks like vin code 8 I did find some info on the broadcast code.
so now my question is why are there diff broadcast codes for the same car of the same year, same aplication.?
Is there an updated memcal with a differant broadcast code that I should be using?
I found a new memcal check it out
http://www.gmpartsdirect.com/results.cfm?singlepart=1&partnumber=16151348
Thanks
scott |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
ANJF is the stock bin for that prom.
The side that your chip is on... that the prom plugs into the adapter and doesn't use is the stock chip.
The other small chip in there is for limp home mode.
The way to tell if it's the "cal pak" or not... is to try plugging JUST the stock prom back in there... no adapter. If that doesn't work, and non of your chips work, you're probably dead ecm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did the no adapter thing but I get nothing at all, but that’s because of vats, I believe.
Haven’t tried a newly burnt chip yet, will try tonight
Just doing some looking at all the diff, broadcast codes. Looks like they are specific to certain things in the car, like rear end gears when running the stock chip.
$84.00 for a new Cardone ecm did some looking into it and it looks like they changed for the better on how they put them together and a few internal components.
Available at smucks...
So if that isn't it its another 458 from gm direct for the memcal.
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| scott in wa. wrote: |
So if that isn't it its another 458 from gm direct for the memcal.
thanks |
458.... dollars?
You can get a prom/memcal for $75 or less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 9:06 am Post subject: opps |
|
|
typo,
should have been $53.60 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mangus Member

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 254 Location: @computer in garage (Bothell)
1989 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If he's getting data (which he is if he's reading Code 52), then it's not a bad burn. If it were, then he'd either get no data (and limp home mode), or checksum routine would fail, spitting out code 51.
If it ran before and you didn't have VATS disabled, then you were likely running in limp home mode. Burn a chip with VATS disabled and give that a go. In a nutshell, there are a few things that can go wrong just in the area of the ECM/Calpak/Chip. Ensure you've got everything set up correctly. Post a pic if you need to.
-M |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|