| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:43 pm Post subject: Sudden crappy gas mileage... |
|
|
So I just got back from Rochester, filled my tank up before I left, took the back roads and drove nice and I got home with 1/4 tank. Something is causing my gas mileage to suck balls I haven't noticed til now because I only go back and forth to bremerton today wad the eye opener. I found 2 vac leaks the other day and I fixed them but that didn't really help. I ran a scan tool on my CTS and it seemed right, O2 reading was normal, I did my plugs a few weeks ago and I'm getting a normal 02 so I know the plugs are firing right... I'm stumped. I tried finding more vac leaks with a can of carbon cleaner but I didn't even catch the two I found with that method
Anybody got any tips? I've been driving really nice lately so i know my foot isn't to blame!! Odd thing about the CTS is when Luke pulled a datalog on my car the cts showed -40* which indicates a dead sensor or its unplugged, but that scan tool showed normal so idk what to think _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Was the O2 switching? I have seen them continue to read but only on one end of the scale. This will not throw a code but the mileage will crap out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What do you mean switching?? I gotta admit I was out of my element because the scan tool I was usig was a very old snap on one lol it read 435ish mv consistently so judging by your question its not supposed to be a static number lol my old tool I used in az used to highlight problem values on the table in red kind of an idiot proof feature  _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Basically the idea is that the O2 will read from 0 to 1000mv with 450mv being the switching point and anything above and below being rich and lean respectively.
You want it to be switching between lean and rich all the time. If it hangs on one side or the other either the sensor is boned (most likely, considering it's a single-wire sensor in a header) or there is a significant mechanical problem that it cannot compensate for (i.e. injector stuck open, ect.).
Last edited by aaron_sK on Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I checked injectors first for an odd spray or leaky pod and found nothing, the sensor must be toast because ive noticed a strong(er) gas smell, and if under 500 is lean then the ecm must be trying to compensate and dump in fuel. Come to think of it my o2 bung is pretty high up there...it wouldn't suprise me to be honest
Sound reasoning yes? _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BTW, does your scanner show cross counts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's that? _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ECM keeps track of how many times the O2 crosses stoich. That should come up on any scan or datalog as cross counts or O2 counts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never checked that, ill have to get a tool locally to check but with the way its been acting a 20$ gamble might not be a bad idea _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doesnt have to be the motor thats causing problems.
Tire pressure
tire alignment
extra weight in the car
draging brake pad
any sort of friction from a fubared bearing _________________ 2008 GMC Z71
1991 Camaro RS Vert
1972 Jimmy 4x4
20ft Longhorn Car Hauler
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is true but I've noticed a strong gas smell formed Im pretty ocd about all the other stuff too so that's why I'm lookin under the hood first, plus the sensor isn't behaving properly I just need to confirm it. _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like O2 to me. All fueling is based off the o2's report to the ECM when in closed loop. If the o2 lies, the computer doesn't know unless it's way out of range and puts up a fault code, it just adjusts fueling based on what information it got.
I'd also be suspect of the CTS as you've had possible failures or erroneous readings. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two more things now that it's not 1am:
Don't buy a Bosch O2 sensor. They are crappy crap. Buy NTK or Delco or something.
If you are having trouble with inconsistent CTS readings then check the wires. I have seen the wire get kinked right where it comes out of the plug. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BluFbdy Member
Joined: 16 Jul 2010 Posts: 915 Location: Port Orchard WA
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I ran the scan tool on the cts and it behaved normally under the tests, disconnecting I got -40 like it should but when I jumpered the two it was supposed to be in a range of like 180 to 220 or somethig and it landed way below that so the wires failed the test I checked the pins and they're a bit grimy so I'm gonna clean them. I also backed up the cts being good by doing a resistance check as it cooled down all are in range with gm specs
And I did buy a Bosch lol now it makes sense ill snag a delco today and hope it works _________________ If you expect a kick to the balls and get a slap to the face its still a victory
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|