Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

New member here

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vega_guy_76
Member


Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Location: St Helens, OR


PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:27 am    Post subject: New member here Reply with quote

As the subject states, I'm a new member here. I know quite a few of you already though through a common friend, Mark (the guy who's got a pic around of him holding Tony's hand). Shocked Mike (Schultzy89GTA) may remember me as the 'kid' who damn near shizzle his pants in the back of the GTA when he had the nitrous backfire. My main reason for joining is that I'm tired of driving an old heavy pig that gets terrible fuel mileage, and the best replacement i can think of would be a third gen f-body. Around '86-'88 Firebird with TPI, and manual trans; I don't care too much about anything else.
Well, I feel that's enough rambling on for now...

Charlie

_________________
2000 Dodge Dakota SLT Club Cab 4x4, 3.9 V6, 5spd manual, 3.55 gears
1976 GMC Sprint SP, Buick 455, TH400, 2.56 gears--- 14.640 @ 93.22mph 2.234 60'
1976 Vega Wagon, Buick 3.2L V6, TH350, 2.56 gears
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
iansane
Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 5742
Location: Bothell

1991 Pontiac Trans Am

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome!

psst. Get a 91-92. Very Happy

Thirdgen f-bods aren't that much less of fuel guzzling pigs though. They just look better. Thumbs up

_________________

Quote:
Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Schultzy89GTA
M.R.A. (11sec Club)


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 4417
Location: Gresham, OR

1989 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Charlie!

Hope those shorts cleaned up ok. Still have a stain on my back seat though Wink

Good luck on your search. What price range are you looking for so we can keep our eyes open?

-Schultzy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
vega_guy_76
Member


Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Location: St Helens, OR


PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'91-'92 is completely out of consideration. I personally hate the ground effects on them. They just ruin the lines of a beautiful car. And I am pretty sure there is no comparison of a 3rd gen to my Sprint. My Sprint (Mark used to own it untill he blew the rearend) weighs 4100 lbs with me in it, and the best fuel economy to date is 13.5mpg. I'm 95% sure a TPI car will easily do better than that.

I have sent Jess an e-mail to see if his GTA is still available, if it is I'm gonna pick that one up. If not, my price range is around $2500.

After checking Ebay, it looks like the years I'm looking for are '85-'90. But I recall that '85 was a funky year for the TPI computer, so let's just call it '86-'90.

Charlie

_________________
2000 Dodge Dakota SLT Club Cab 4x4, 3.9 V6, 5spd manual, 3.55 gears
1976 GMC Sprint SP, Buick 455, TH400, 2.56 gears--- 14.640 @ 93.22mph 2.234 60'
1976 Vega Wagon, Buick 3.2L V6, TH350, 2.56 gears
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 6:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vega_guy_76 wrote:

After checking Ebay, it looks like the years I'm looking for are '85-'90. But I recall that '85 was a funky year for the TPI computer, so let's just call it '86-'90.

Charlie


They changed the computer in 90 also.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
iansane
Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 5742
Location: Bothell

1991 Pontiac Trans Am

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vega_guy_76 wrote:
'91-'92 is completely out of consideration. I personally hate the ground effects on them. They just ruin the lines of a beautiful car. And I am pretty sure there is no comparison of a 3rd gen to my Sprint. My Sprint (Mark used to own it untill he blew the rearend) weighs 4100 lbs with me in it, and the best fuel economy to date is 13.5mpg. I'm 95% sure a TPI car will easily do better than that.

I have sent Jess an e-mail to see if his GTA is still available, if it is I'm gonna pick that one up. If not, my price range is around $2500.

After checking Ebay, it looks like the years I'm looking for are '85-'90. But I recall that '85 was a funky year for the TPI computer, so let's just call it '86-'90.

Charlie


Well if you get a 91 formula then you don't have to worry about the gfx now do you?

My old 87 never saw better than 150 miles to the tank. But then again I always had my foot in it cause the damn thing was slow.

There were many changes in the induction over those years, you should look into the differences. You may have a preference to a specific year.

_________________

Quote:
Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got about 15mpg with my 305 TPI and that was driving casually and had a 25mile round trip freeway excursion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
alloy
T56 Elitist


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 1716
Location: Vancouver, WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well I'm somewhat heavy footed and routinely get 18 mpg with my 1987 305 TPI manual trans car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
85 T/A WS6
Member


Joined: 18 Feb 2004
Posts: 539
Location: Buckley

1985 Pontiac Trans Am

PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome !

I would not discount the 85 and If I had a choice I would pick an 85 over the 86 (the 86 got the weaker camshaft) I am biased of course, we have 2 85's (LB9 & L69) but I can tell you first hand a well maintained 85 will provide you with a reasonable degree of relaibility.

_________________

1985 Trans Am Recaro Option (AS5)
67,000 miles 5.0 TPI Hi Flow MAF
TPI Airfoil w/Bypass Flowmaster WS6 (.92g)
3:27 Borg Warner Posi K&N Filtration
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Jess
Administrator


Joined: 24 Nov 2003
Posts: 429
Location: Mount Vernon, WA

1988 Pontiac Formula

PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Welcome aboard man Wavey I think my best tank out of the 88 was 24MPG on the freeway. And once I squeezed 336 miles out of one tank...
_________________
'88 Formula
'95 Trans Am - Sold
'88 GTA - Sold
'89 Firebird V6 - Sold
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group