Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Weight
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:27 pm    Post subject: Weight Reply with quote

I hope i dont get flamed for this, but is there any weight to save by cutting out the stock frame anywhere? I read posts where people drop a couple hundred by tubbing the rear but what about other areas? I was mainly thinking the front. Im sure it would violate some rules somewhere but i dont plan on doing anything but drift autocross or drag. I was hoping to tube the entire front and tie it in with framing to the rear subframe.

Or am i just thinking too big and should get a lighter car?

_________________
E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drag guys run tube chassis cars all day.

If you're worried about getting weight off the front I hate to break it to you but I know of a big 700lb savings to be had. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing I know. Iron block heads and intake come in at 650 lbs dry. So mine weights 625. Lol. If i go with a small block im only saving 200 pounds unless i get something with aluminum heads. With my v6 and bare minimum interior it still was 2950. I was hoping to mainly cut chassis weight before i think about another engine swap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
QwkTrip
11sec Club


Joined: 17 Feb 2004
Posts: 3942
Location: Peoria, IL

1989 Pontiac Firebird

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just make more HP. It's so easy with your engine. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IROCDave
Member


Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 957
Location: Snohomish WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, I cant help it. I wouldnt touch anything on the sub frames with a BBC sitting between the tires. Alluminum heads, intake, water pump, smaller raidator, relocate battery etc would all be better options.

What Aaron was leading youn into is the weight difference between an all cast iron BBC and a late model LS2+. You would save about 300+ pounds and have the same power potential with the latter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know, this is the last engine i play with before going to lsx.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IROCDave wrote:
What Aaron was leading youn into is the weight difference between an all cast iron BBC and a late model LS2+.


That wasn't specifically where I was going with that, but you are correct, Dave. Laughing

Bottom line is that we are dealing with a frame and suspension that was robbed from a fullsize car with no consideration given to weight.

If you wanted to go fast around corners you would be building a full tube-framed car, or an MX5 or E30. But where's the fun (and cost savings Razz) in that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chevymad
Master B


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 5476


1987 Pontiac Formula

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fullsize? It's malibu/s10 stuff. The chevelle/malibu are mid-size cars. Razz

And the 1st/2nd gens were nova, which was the "small" car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is the nova the best small vehicle with a V8 RWD? I kick myself for not picking up the Nova my friend had for sale. I love the camaro, don't like the weight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You want to autocross the Nova?

*Edit: So I take it back Laughing

chevymad wrote:
Fullsize? It's malibu/s10 stuff.


All the GM front suspension stuff was based off of the B-body... from 1959. Rolling Eyes Except for the MacPherson and the fact that it's bolted up underneath the rails.

I understand why they never changed it. It's cheap and strong and it works. It's not light, it's not small, and so it's not an optimal setup for going fast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chevymad
Master B


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 5476


1987 Pontiac Formula

PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The full size cars impala's and such all had their steering behind the crossmember. not in front like the chevelle/malibu/nova.

Here's a pic of a 68.. notice the arm for the tie rod end behind the rotor. Also the front end uses radius arms forward of the lower control arm. By this time the chevelle was allready using the suspension we are used to.



And a pic of the lower control arm itself.



I just happen to have owned a 68 impala and chevelle. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The malibu front looks way more enticing than the camaro. Sigh. Maybe the best i could do is a tubular k member and just accept the weight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jchaussee
Member


Joined: 14 Nov 2010
Posts: 1318
Location: renton


PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guy on TGO redid his whole front end. I don't know how much wieght he loss though
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 12:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alright alright B, beat me up on the technicalities. Laughing

I stand by my basic argument though. They recycled antiquated technology into an alleged "sports" car to save money.

blue89 wrote:
tubular k member and just accept the weight.


That's my basic plan! Wink Except I'm not even running a tubular since this thing will be street-driven and I drive through Tacoma (pothole hell) frequently.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alphius
Peanut


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 2429
Location: Grand Mound

1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Solution to too much weight: higher intake pressure. Wink
_________________
84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
chevymad
Master B


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 5476


1987 Pontiac Formula

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or a 502 boss hog. Not much more weight savings can go on there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing so hard it hurts
Those are truly the stupidest things ever.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schultzy89GTA
M.R.A. (11sec Club)


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 4417
Location: Gresham, OR

1989 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about an LS3 with ~500hp?









Dude riding it was about 6'5" and in his 60's.... loving life!

-Schultzy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For when a lifted diesel crewcab isn't enough to express your inadequacies? Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Schultzy89GTA
M.R.A. (11sec Club)


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 4417
Location: Gresham, OR

1989 Pontiac GTA

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL... that is one small winkie there Wink

-Schultzy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Back Porch All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group