| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:25 am Post subject: How do you get the F*ing fuel tank out |
|
|
... without cutting the filler neck? It went in! Why can't I get it out?
I had to drop the F*ing axle. I can't get a good enough angle to slip out the F*ing tank. And I'm having an F*ing good time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alphius Peanut

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 2429 Location: Grand Mound
1984 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rotate and tilt. Try new and exciting positions.
I promise, it will come out eventually.  _________________ 84 Camaro Z28 - LS1/T56
85 Silverado - Low and Slow |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess I had to stop trying so hard. I took a rest and it fell out by itself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
LMAO! I've always found getting the ass end up high enough is the key. Then rotate the tip one way or the other to get it to slide out.
Of course dropping the diff and panhard brace.
No cutting holes for you? ;0p _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| No cutting holes for me. I'm prepping the 4th gen tank to go back up in it's place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I still need to get around to putting my 4thgen tank and racetronix setup back it. Although, my factory filler neck is pre-cracked for easy removal.
What are you going to bolt/screw your filler neck to on the car side? I haven't even taken a look yet to see what's back there. _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Haven't even gotten that far. Why not just leave it loose? Not like it can go anywhere attached to the tank and pinned inside the fuel door compartment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schultzy89GTA M.R.A. (11sec Club)

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 4417 Location: Gresham, OR
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sucker is fun the first time eh?
-Schultzy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now that I have the 4th gen pump module disassembled I'm thinking pretty hard about doing the '97 Grand Prix fuel sender mod. Even though it is expensive it seems a lot less risky then screwing up my fuel gauge trying to solder in a resistor.
I think the sender for 3rd gen gauge is GM p/n 25319676. It's about $130 through Rock Auto. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two stupid questions:
1) Can't you put the resistor inline?
2) What the heck are you doing still running stock gauges?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Later year Firebird gauges look good. No need to change that up.
Uh.... I can't remember exactly about the resistor thing. Been a while since I looked up that info. I think there is a resistor bridge in the fuel gauge that gets modified. Adding a resistor in-line would increase the total resistance and just make the needle sit on 'Full' all the time, wouldn't it?
The other thing I'm doing, and this might seem weird to some of you, is I'm getting rid of the F-body in-tank fuel regulator and using the 'Vette filter & regulator. That way the regulator is easily serviceable without dropping the tank and every time I change the filter I get a new regulator too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Does the 'Vette have a return line? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| QwkTrip wrote: | Later year Firebird gauges look good. No need to change that up.
Uh.... I can't remember exactly about the resistor thing. Been a while since I looked up that info. I think there is a resistor bridge in the fuel gauge that gets modified. Adding a resistor in-line would increase the total resistance and just make the needle sit on 'Full' all the time, wouldn't it?
The other thing I'm doing, and this might seem weird to some of you, is I'm getting rid of the F-body in-tank fuel regulator and using the 'Vette filter & regulator. That way the regulator is easily serviceable without dropping the tank and every time I change the filter I get a new regulator too. |
I'm getting rid of the fbody reg too. I was hoping I was going to be okay just pulling the reg out and letting it free spew in the tank.
And the resistor thing seems WAY easier than the sending unit in the tank. It's not an inline resistor its a resistor on each side of the gauge so EMPTY become like 40ohm and FULL becomes ~240ohm or something. (I forget the actual values). But either way, I'm not spending $100+ on a sending unit when this one works fine and makes replacement later on down the line that much easier. I had to do the 12v+resistor inline to the tach instead of getting a new guage so this is simple.
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/ltx-lsx/565520-modifying-stock-gauge-40-a.html
That post explains is really well. _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | | Does the 'Vette have a return line? |
Yes, but it comes from the filter/reg assembly at the rear of the car, not from the fuel rail. It's the same setup I'm using.
| QwkTrip wrote: | | Haven't even gotten that far. Why not just leave it loose? Not like it can go anywhere attached to the tank and pinned inside the fuel door compartment. |
Out of everyone here I figured "leaving it loose" would bother you as much as it would bother me.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll just have to see what the filler neck is like when installed. If it is floppy then I will do something to tie it down.
I don't like the looks of my fuel module. I'm ordering a new one from Racetronix. Better to start new then to redo. You've got me thinking again about changing resistors in the fuel gauge. Looks pretty easy now that I see the pictures again.
A long time ago I had a friend modify my tachometer by changing out a resistor. As far as we could tell the only purpose of that resistor was final calibration as it didn't really change the function. He had a waveform generator and kept tuning it until it was spot on from 200 - 8000 RPM. I've got the most accurate stock tach in history.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, I forgot to mention about removing the regulator....
The stock 4th gen tank has no baffles so the bucket is necessary to make sure the pump doesn't get starved of fuel. The bucket is filled by a venturi feed off the bottom of the bucket, and the fuel from the return line dumps back into the bucket too. Even when the fuel tank is low on fuel the bucket is filled and the pump is cooled. If you use a stock pump I would just spill the return line fuel back into the bucket. If you use a high flow pump then you have to start worrying about aeriation of the fuel. I think one way to overcome that is using a larger diameter return line so the pump doesn't beat the fuel working against a pressure head.
This is just my opinion, but I think cutting out the bottom of the bucket for a Walbro pump is foolish. At that point you're basically resigning to having a fuel tank with no baffles to hold fuel at the pump. I chose the Racetronix because it maintains the venturi feed and leave the bucket in tact. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since I am buying a new fuel module I sacrificed mine to figure out how that regulator housing is installed.
The regulator housing slips onto the white nipple and is molded around the stepped portion of the stainless shaft. It is integral to the fuel module and cannot be removed unless cut away. (Easy enough with a Dremel Multi-Max and the stainless shaft seems to be hard enough that the cutting tool didn't damage it.) The stainless shaft is hollow and has something to do with the fuel return, maybe primary overflow past the regulator? Anyway, the hollow tube will be rendered useless once you remove the regulator insert from the regulator housing.
The regulator housing slips over the outside of the nipple from the fuel return hose, so it doesn't restrict flow at all. I guess my recommendation is to leave the regulator housing in place and not try to remove it. Just remove the regulator and the o-ring so it doesn't come loose and fall into the fuel bucket.
If you had a purpose for routing the fuel return to a certain location then you would have to cut out the regulator housing so you can attach a hose to the nipple. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| QwkTrip wrote: | | leave the regulator housing in place and not try to remove it. Just remove the regulator and the o-ring so it doesn't come loose and fall into the fuel bucket. |
Exactly how I have it done, waiting to get slapped into the bird. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Keeping notes, this is something I want to do badly to my car. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have a possibly stupid question relating to the fourthgen tank: How much weight savings are you guys seeing vs. the steel tank? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|