| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which 5thgen T/A is the better design? |
| Trans Am Depot's T/A |
|
64% |
[ 9 ] |
| Lingenfelter LTA |
|
21% |
[ 3 ] |
| all 5thgens suck |
|
14% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
| Author |
Message |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:45 pm Post subject: Trans Am Depot T/A > Lingenfelter LTA |
|
|
This badasss 5thgen T/A is the Hotrod cover car this month! I love it! Trans Am Depot's design is way cooler than the Lingenfelter LTA. What do you guys think?
Trans Am Depot T/A:
Lingenfelter LTA:
Trans Am Depot's car is powered by a supercharged LS3 while the lingenfelter version has a 455ci LSX. _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for giving me a third option.
Lingenfelter's is a 73-74, while the TAD is a 76-ish Smokey & The Bandit era knockoff.
Bottom line is that any car by any manufacturer which is that tall in the fenders/quarters area will be ugly as sin.
When I was a kid I remember Pontiac's "Wider is better" ad campaign for the Trans Ams. That stuff was sex. Now everything is just artificially jacked up, with monster donk wheels.
This new "tall car" fad is a joke. There has not been a single good looking car made for well over a decade now.
See? Now I'm just ranting.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is the LP car rocking some ~18" snowflake-ish wheels?!
Brandon, how about those wheels for your 2ndgen? _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can get those all the way up into the 20s. There's a set of silvers on sale on a board i frequent right now.. brand new 17s and tires for $1k...
My car is too early for that style wheel actually. Thats more of a bandit era type wheel. I did envision the silver ones on the 87 though..
Edit, i'm talking the honeycombs on the black car. The snowflakes on the white car, while fitting for it, are kinda fugly lol. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iansane wrote: | Is the LP car rocking some ~18" snowflake-ish wheels?! |
20s actually!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think I like the Ling version better. Paint scheme excluded. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
86toy Member
Joined: 20 Jan 2010 Posts: 61 Location: tacoma
1986 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bad ass looking cars now if only gm would produce the damm thing we could have fun  _________________ 86 t/a 305 tpi 700r4 3.73 possi 4 wheel disc
245/45/17 restoring |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm kinda mixed. I really really like the grill area of the white one. And while trying to do a retro car, they did a very good job on it. But the lower turn signals and rims are :puke:
As aaron said, the black one looks strait 100% like a smokey replica. I feel they did a very good job on it.
I feel if gm were to do either one, it would be like the black one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d00012 Member

Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 679 Location: Granite Falls
2007 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Lingenfelter is a 455 LS motor...
I looked at pictures in Hot Rod magazine last night, and the cowl on the Lingenfelter is non-functional, just a hood ornament. The other T/A's cowl is functional, but is just the standard LS3.
Still...I don't like the tall look. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
townaj Member
Joined: 04 Dec 2008 Posts: 326 Location: San Antone, TX
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree, they are wayyy too damn tall to be a sports car. If they weren't so tall they would be damn sexy. I like the trans am depot one better though, if i had to choose one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe functional. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
QwkTrip 11sec Club

Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm boycotting the vote because I think both look silly.
The black car is obviously a Camaro with a huge bird on the hood. Tacky.
The white one is a mix of a 1st gen remake and 2nd gen front end. It's wrong. And it's ugly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pathology knight Member
Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 306 Location: entiat, WA.
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
being that they are both based off of different year t/a, it's hard to pic one. i like them both. they both did a good job of doing the retro thing based off of the years they picked. _________________ we all gotta start somewhere.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| d00012 wrote: | The other T/A's cowl is functional, but is just the standard LS3.
|
Standard LS3 + super charger!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveoformula Member

Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 1799 Location: OR
1988 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The white one just looks awkward to me, but I think there both trying to hard to be retro, throw in a couple new additions maybe I'd like it _________________
'88 FORMULA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
d00012 Member

Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 679 Location: Granite Falls
2007 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Standard LS3 + super charger!  |
It's supercharged? Didn't see that in the magazine...hmm.
I like the sound of a 455 LS instead of a...what displacement is the LS3?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 6.2L IIRC. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| d00012 wrote: | | Quote: |
Standard LS3 + super charger!  |
It's supercharged? Didn't see that in the magazine...hmm.
I like the sound of a 455 LS instead of a...what displacement is the LS3?  |
Yup, its 6.2L (376ci) and got a Procharger. Doesn't say how much power it makes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RSFreak wrote: | | Doesn't say how much power it makes. |
^
More than this
Less than this
V
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|