Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

so i got to thinkin
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
83Z28BlackBetty
Bam-Ba-Lam


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 2083
Location: Aloha

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:42 am    Post subject: so i got to thinkin Reply with quote

so i got to thinkin the other day...i know, could be dangerous

about the future of my car. where do i want it eventually. this is all way off in the future, but I'm just wanting to plan and get some insight on a few ideas. I will most likely be upgrading to a 3.4 ish or 3.7 ish rear. and still debating on an auto or manual. I will stick with a carbed setup and the possibility of spray or supercharger are slim.

I'm looking for the pros, cons, and specs about some different engine builds.

stroking it to a 383

building a 400sbc

dropping in a 454 (dad's idea)

After doing some initial research, I've found that a 454 only ads about 150 lbs depending on the heads over a small block. I'm leaning towards a 400 simply because it will have lots of torque, and its a small block (more parts available) i don't have cams or heads picked out at this point, I'm simply curious what the possibilities are with each.

~JAKE

_________________
1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was reading about 383 stuff somewhere and it seems that combination of bore/stroke produces more hp/cu.in. than any other sbc combination. I don't know if that helped you at all, just an interesting bit of info. Mike should chime in, he actually has one.

I would love to do a bbc build. Those engines are cool.
http://www.roadsters.com/bbc/

I found that site a long time ago. It has all the bore/stroke info on bbc's. Good stuff. But which bbc combo yeilds the most, I have no clue.

_________________
E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sellmanb
Member


Joined: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 727
Location: Tigard, OR


PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why not a stroked 400, small block 427, then you can keep your extra 150 pounds off the car, at a loss of only 28ci.

I've always been a fan of 400 builds, but the aftermarket for 400's isnt too great when you're looking for heads or bottom end pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big blocks are a lot of work in these cars, ask qwktrip.

Look at schultzy 383 combo, that is a stout motor. What are you HP goals, or track time goals, or whatever. It turns into a big bench rancing session, unless you have laid out your goals yet, if you have those, then we can talk about what combo will get you to where you want to be.

--John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i raced a friend of mine he has a destroked 400 and he runs in the mid 12' on pump gas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Quasi-Traction
"I have petals"


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3873
Location: stumptown

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dewey316 wrote:

What are you HP goals, or track time goals, or whatever. It turns into a big bench racing session, unless you have laid out your goals yet, if you have those, then we can talk about what combo will get you to where you want to be.

--John


Basically what John said. 383's are sweet, but a small displacement V8 can also make excellent power, without forced induction.
If forced induction is out of the question completely (nitros, turbo, Supercharger), I could see the justification for the bigger cubes.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rjmcgee
The Hammer


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 2328



PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's all about displacement. If some racing rule limits displacement then I can see something like a destroked 400 making sence. Since that isn't an issue you want to build as many inches as you can. If you have a 400 block then build a 400 or bigger. If you have a 350 block the onle logical thing to do is buy a stroker kit for it. Since there was prolly 100+ 350's for every one 400 made there are alot more peple building 383's then building 400's.

Take a 383 and a 400 with identical heads, cams, and everything else identical, the 400 will make more power due to it's displacement advantage.

Just my 2cents
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DBL_TKE
Member


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 1505
Location: Aloha, OR

1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm actually just about to go look at 4 different complete 400's (minus the intake) that somebody is selling for $300 each. He also has one that he said is built up a bit more. I'm going with a fellow coworker and his brother (who is a mechanic). they'll be tearing apart those engine to make sure that nothing is wrong with them. They are on engine stands and running so we can do tests on them. If you're really interested in a SBC 400 then I could get you some more info on them or you could come and check them out for yourself.
_________________
Richmond 3.73 posi| 36/24 sway bars | SLP LM2 | Koni's | Ground Control 800/200 | Y2K wheels | Dyno Don headers & Y-pipe | airfoil | BBK underdrive pulleys | Raised strut mounts | Extended ball joints | LCARB'S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The cubes for a 400 are nice, but the durability of a 383 is much more appealing to me.

It's about displacement to some.... to others... it's about how high you wanna rev!

There is an older gal with a '90 Firebird locally who holds a national record in one of the drag classes running mid 7 seconds in the quater. With a naturally apsirated.......... wait for it....... wait for it........... 283!!!! She leaves the starting line at 9000RPM and shifts at 14k. Now there is some power!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
RSFreak
The other "John"


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 2946
Location: Renton

1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would keep that 150lbs off the nose and put in a nice 383. Personally, I have always wanted to do a 327 build but probably never will...
_________________
'86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BigDaddyVu
12sec Club


Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Spokane, Wa

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

just buy one complete. http://spokane.craigslist.org/car/403686397.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
83Z28BlackBetty
Bam-Ba-Lam


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 2083
Location: Aloha

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cool guys, so after more thinking. I guess I should say that Nitro is not out of the question, just merely not right away. As far as turbo, or super charger. I'm thinking against it. and the 454 is out, due to all the extra mods needing to be done.

SO: SBC, 383 or 400?

I'm curious what are the advantages of a 383 over a 400? or visa versa?
I've been told something about consistent power all over the RPM range, or faster reving? Embarassed

As far as goals, I'd like to see 12's (doesn't everybody) Razz but keep it streetable and able to corner well.

~JAKE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Quasi-Traction
"I have petals"


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3873
Location: stumptown

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

my vote is for the 383. Easier to find a block in usable shape.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I vote LT1. Twisted Evil

Whats the difference in blocks between the 383 and 400?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
83Z28BlackBetty
Bam-Ba-Lam


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 2083
Location: Aloha

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

blue89 wrote:
I vote LT1. Twisted Evil

Whats the difference in blocks between the 383 and 400?


nothing, well the cylinders are a bit biggerm but the block itself is the same. and i'd like to stay away from FI just for complicated swapping sake. unless someone wants to wire the whole thing in and tune it for me.

as far as finding a 400 crank and block in useable shape, they are all over the place! they all need rebuilding of course Razz and if i went with the 383 i'd still have to find a 400 crank and rods. this is going to be a slow process so i don't mind waiting around to find the right parts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you plan to spray it at some point, get the 383. I don't know that you need a 383 either, look at Pauls combo, you could build build darn near the same thing, with a carb on it, and be where you want to be. You will also want to figure out what you are going to do about the tranny, rear end, etc, because there is a lot more to going that fast, than just the motor.

--John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
83Z28BlackBetty
Bam-Ba-Lam


Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Posts: 2083
Location: Aloha

1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

why the 383 with spray? is it something to do with reving faster?
tranny: not quite sure yet, still thinkin. I really like manuals but i may keep the auto.
rear end: this will come before the new motor for sure. but i need a posi with a gear ratio around 3.73. whether its a 9 or 10 bolt will depend on what i can find.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the 400 has siamised cyl walls, for forced induction where a lot of heat is made, its not as good of an idea. Brandon may eleberate on this more, but the 400 is not as good at getting rid of heat.

--John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Quasi-Traction
"I have petals"


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3873
Location: stumptown

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

blue89 wrote:


Whats the difference in blocks between the 383 and 400?


Siamesed bores, different cooling passages are the two I know of. Most 400's are 2 bolt mains also.

*EDIT*

I'll elaborate on what John said about the cooling passages. 400's have "steam holes" VS a standard SBC, which actually allows coolent to flow between the bores. 400's also are harder to overbore (usually only a max tolerance around .020"), especially if there's any kind of core shift in the casting. Some people sleeve them for safety and added thermal protection to keep the bores true and make the engine last longer.

Some 400's also have slightly shorter rods (5.7003 VS 5.5620 for the 400)

The mains are splayed from the factory, which is one advantage to the 400.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chevymad
Master B


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 5476


1987 Pontiac Formula

PostPosted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

4 bolt 400 blocks are junk. I don't think they're splayed either, but there is less material in them then the 2bolt blocks. To build a strong 400 based motor you need to use a 2 bolt block with aftermarket 4 bolt splayed caps.

All factory 400s use the short rods, so they have a bad rod/stroke ratio and also cause piston scuffing.

Overbore is generally a max of 0.030 then the block is junk. The occasional block will make 0.040, but most people try to stay at 0.020. Some blocks will have overheating problems with any additional bore.

Stock 400s were complete boat anchors. The heads of the time didnt flow enough for that many cubes. So you'll definatly be needing a set of aftermarket heads for one. I'm old enough to remember the days people took their 400s out and threw them in the river, then put in a 350.

The only way i'd build a 400 based motor myself, is with an aftermarket block.

Now the 383 also has some of these issues. When you increase the rod length to fix the rod/stroke ratio and scuffing problem, you start putting the piston pin into the oil ring. You then have to use ring supports to hold the oil ring. 5.7 rods don't have this problem but 6.0's do. Something to think about with boost or spray.

The 350 block can generally be safely overbored to 0.060 over. So you can usually get 2 complete overhauls and a couple more re-rings out of the same motor. Stock 4 bolt blocks are good and so are the 2bolt, but here again for the ultimate go aftermarket splayed.

There's no way i'd start with a stock 400 crank/rods for a 383 build. First you'd have to have the crank machined down to 350 journal specs. The 400 journals are larger. Plus as mentioned the factory rods are junk. Then you have to have the whole thing balanced. For the price of the scat/eagle rotating kits, you'd have to be nutz to go this route.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> Garage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group