| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:42 am Post subject: so i got to thinkin |
|
|
so i got to thinkin the other day...i know, could be dangerous
about the future of my car. where do i want it eventually. this is all way off in the future, but I'm just wanting to plan and get some insight on a few ideas. I will most likely be upgrading to a 3.4 ish or 3.7 ish rear. and still debating on an auto or manual. I will stick with a carbed setup and the possibility of spray or supercharger are slim.
I'm looking for the pros, cons, and specs about some different engine builds.
stroking it to a 383
building a 400sbc
dropping in a 454 (dad's idea)
After doing some initial research, I've found that a 454 only ads about 150 lbs depending on the heads over a small block. I'm leaning towards a 400 simply because it will have lots of torque, and its a small block (more parts available) i don't have cams or heads picked out at this point, I'm simply curious what the possibilities are with each.
~JAKE _________________ 1983 Z-28 5.7 LT1, T56, Headman headers, BW 9 Bolt Posi Disc, WS6 suspension
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was reading about 383 stuff somewhere and it seems that combination of bore/stroke produces more hp/cu.in. than any other sbc combination. I don't know if that helped you at all, just an interesting bit of info. Mike should chime in, he actually has one.
I would love to do a bbc build. Those engines are cool.
http://www.roadsters.com/bbc/
I found that site a long time ago. It has all the bore/stroke info on bbc's. Good stuff. But which bbc combo yeilds the most, I have no clue. _________________ E30
86 RS - 7.4L V8 SOLD
89 RS - 3.25L V6 REMOVED
89 RS - 5.7L LT1 SOLD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why not a stroked 400, small block 427, then you can keep your extra 150 pounds off the car, at a loss of only 28ci.
I've always been a fan of 400 builds, but the aftermarket for 400's isnt too great when you're looking for heads or bottom end pieces. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big blocks are a lot of work in these cars, ask qwktrip.
Look at schultzy 383 combo, that is a stout motor. What are you HP goals, or track time goals, or whatever. It turns into a big bench rancing session, unless you have laid out your goals yet, if you have those, then we can talk about what combo will get you to where you want to be.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDaddyVu 12sec Club

Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1118 Location: Spokane, Wa
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i raced a friend of mine he has a destroked 400 and he runs in the mid 12' on pump gas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dewey316 wrote: |
What are you HP goals, or track time goals, or whatever. It turns into a big bench racing session, unless you have laid out your goals yet, if you have those, then we can talk about what combo will get you to where you want to be.
--John |
Basically what John said. 383's are sweet, but a small displacement V8 can also make excellent power, without forced induction.
If forced induction is out of the question completely (nitros, turbo, Supercharger), I could see the justification for the bigger cubes. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's all about displacement. If some racing rule limits displacement then I can see something like a destroked 400 making sence. Since that isn't an issue you want to build as many inches as you can. If you have a 400 block then build a 400 or bigger. If you have a 350 block the onle logical thing to do is buy a stroker kit for it. Since there was prolly 100+ 350's for every one 400 made there are alot more peple building 383's then building 400's.
Take a 383 and a 400 with identical heads, cams, and everything else identical, the 400 will make more power due to it's displacement advantage.
Just my 2cents |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DBL_TKE Member

Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1505 Location: Aloha, OR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm actually just about to go look at 4 different complete 400's (minus the intake) that somebody is selling for $300 each. He also has one that he said is built up a bit more. I'm going with a fellow coworker and his brother (who is a mechanic). they'll be tearing apart those engine to make sure that nothing is wrong with them. They are on engine stands and running so we can do tests on them. If you're really interested in a SBC 400 then I could get you some more info on them or you could come and check them out for yourself. _________________ Richmond 3.73 posi| 36/24 sway bars | SLP LM2 | Koni's | Ground Control 800/200 | Y2K wheels | Dyno Don headers & Y-pipe | airfoil | BBK underdrive pulleys | Raised strut mounts | Extended ball joints | LCARB'S
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
The cubes for a 400 are nice, but the durability of a 383 is much more appealing to me.
It's about displacement to some.... to others... it's about how high you wanna rev!
There is an older gal with a '90 Firebird locally who holds a national record in one of the drag classes running mid 7 seconds in the quater. With a naturally apsirated.......... wait for it....... wait for it........... 283!!!! She leaves the starting line at 9000RPM and shifts at 14k. Now there is some power! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSFreak The other "John"

Joined: 23 Jan 2004 Posts: 2946 Location: Renton
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would keep that 150lbs off the nose and put in a nice 383. Personally, I have always wanted to do a 327 build but probably never will... _________________ '86 Trans Am - 5.0L TPI - LT1 cam - 700R4 - WS6
'85 Camaro Berlinetta - IROC clone
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDaddyVu 12sec Club

Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1118 Location: Spokane, Wa
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
cool guys, so after more thinking. I guess I should say that Nitro is not out of the question, just merely not right away. As far as turbo, or super charger. I'm thinking against it. and the 454 is out, due to all the extra mods needing to be done.
SO: SBC, 383 or 400?
I'm curious what are the advantages of a 383 over a 400? or visa versa?
I've been told something about consistent power all over the RPM range, or faster reving?
As far as goals, I'd like to see 12's (doesn't everybody) but keep it streetable and able to corner well.
~JAKE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
my vote is for the 383. Easier to find a block in usable shape. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I vote LT1.
Whats the difference in blocks between the 383 and 400? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: | I vote LT1.
Whats the difference in blocks between the 383 and 400? |
nothing, well the cylinders are a bit biggerm but the block itself is the same. and i'd like to stay away from FI just for complicated swapping sake. unless someone wants to wire the whole thing in and tune it for me.
as far as finding a 400 crank and block in useable shape, they are all over the place! they all need rebuilding of course and if i went with the 383 i'd still have to find a 400 crank and rods. this is going to be a slow process so i don't mind waiting around to find the right parts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you plan to spray it at some point, get the 383. I don't know that you need a 383 either, look at Pauls combo, you could build build darn near the same thing, with a carb on it, and be where you want to be. You will also want to figure out what you are going to do about the tranny, rear end, etc, because there is a lot more to going that fast, than just the motor.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
why the 383 with spray? is it something to do with reving faster?
tranny: not quite sure yet, still thinkin. I really like manuals but i may keep the auto.
rear end: this will come before the new motor for sure. but i need a posi with a gear ratio around 3.73. whether its a 9 or 10 bolt will depend on what i can find. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
the 400 has siamised cyl walls, for forced induction where a lot of heat is made, its not as good of an idea. Brandon may eleberate on this more, but the 400 is not as good at getting rid of heat.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| blue89 wrote: |
Whats the difference in blocks between the 383 and 400? |
Siamesed bores, different cooling passages are the two I know of. Most 400's are 2 bolt mains also.
*EDIT*
I'll elaborate on what John said about the cooling passages. 400's have "steam holes" VS a standard SBC, which actually allows coolent to flow between the bores. 400's also are harder to overbore (usually only a max tolerance around .020"), especially if there's any kind of core shift in the casting. Some people sleeve them for safety and added thermal protection to keep the bores true and make the engine last longer.
Some 400's also have slightly shorter rods (5.7003 VS 5.5620 for the 400)
The mains are splayed from the factory, which is one advantage to the 400. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
4 bolt 400 blocks are junk. I don't think they're splayed either, but there is less material in them then the 2bolt blocks. To build a strong 400 based motor you need to use a 2 bolt block with aftermarket 4 bolt splayed caps.
All factory 400s use the short rods, so they have a bad rod/stroke ratio and also cause piston scuffing.
Overbore is generally a max of 0.030 then the block is junk. The occasional block will make 0.040, but most people try to stay at 0.020. Some blocks will have overheating problems with any additional bore.
Stock 400s were complete boat anchors. The heads of the time didnt flow enough for that many cubes. So you'll definatly be needing a set of aftermarket heads for one. I'm old enough to remember the days people took their 400s out and threw them in the river, then put in a 350.
The only way i'd build a 400 based motor myself, is with an aftermarket block.
Now the 383 also has some of these issues. When you increase the rod length to fix the rod/stroke ratio and scuffing problem, you start putting the piston pin into the oil ring. You then have to use ring supports to hold the oil ring. 5.7 rods don't have this problem but 6.0's do. Something to think about with boost or spray.
The 350 block can generally be safely overbored to 0.060 over. So you can usually get 2 complete overhauls and a couple more re-rings out of the same motor. Stock 4 bolt blocks are good and so are the 2bolt, but here again for the ultimate go aftermarket splayed.
There's no way i'd start with a stock 400 crank/rods for a 383 build. First you'd have to have the crank machined down to 350 journal specs. The 400 journals are larger. Plus as mentioned the factory rods are junk. Then you have to have the whole thing balanced. For the price of the scat/eagle rotating kits, you'd have to be nutz to go this route. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|