Cascade Crew Forum Index Cascade Crew
Message Forums
 
 GarageGarage   1/4 Mile Table1/4 Mile Table   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

90-92 speed density tpi intake ducting

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> For Sale
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
90droptoproc
Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 490


1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:35 pm    Post subject: 90-92 speed density tpi intake ducting Reply with quote


needed one for my car, ended up with two by mistake
anyone need one?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Danked
Banned


Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 278
Location: Toppenish, Wa


PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i might take, how much?
_________________
Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

it won't fit your car danked.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
90droptoproc
Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 490


1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ya this one only fits V8's sorry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this would fit an LT1 tho huh? Canada
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
90droptoproc
Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 490


1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

should fit, but check with some of the more LT1 inteligent peoples on the site Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why would you need it for LT1? LT1's need elbows.



I, however, might be interested.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you sure you need an elbow for an LT1? you could run the air thru the snorkles.

What years LT1's are SD and what years are MAF?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Twilightoptics
Hardcore (12sec Club)


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 9191
Location: Auburn , WA

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought they were all maf? Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just checked 92-93 LT1's were SD, 94 was the switch to MAF.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know mine is maf, its in my backyard! Right now tho, the intake goes straight over and draws from the driver side and has the nasty little intake resonance horn thing as well as some turns in the intake to accomodate. I wouldn't mind moving the MAF so it can use a dual snorkle intake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Quasi-Traction
"I have petals"


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3873
Location: stumptown

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, a little off topic.....just because I always wondered

What's the difference between Speed Density and Mass Air Flow induction systems?

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Al Hasse
Member


Joined: 19 Nov 2005
Posts: 4379
Location: Bremerton, WA

1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Found sort of an explanation on a Z28 board

http://www.z28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5808


http://www.z28.com/forum/showpost.php?s=a977d893b0042cb5c673a660a41c55f8&p=34729&postcount=12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MAF: wire in intake duct (before throttle) with voltage running through it. More air = different temp = voltage change, so the ECU knows how much air is coming into the engine.

MAP = sensor in the intake that measures pressure. Voltage changes from that sensor essentially do the same thing as with a MAF.

*Edit: Al beat me to it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Quasi-Traction
"I have petals"


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 3873
Location: stumptown

1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That cleared it up a little. I think I more or less get the jist.

One take air speed and temp that the motor is taking in through the throttle body---Mass Air Flow

The other mesures the pressure of the air coming through the upper plenum and adjusts how much fuel to inject into the motor accordingly---Speed Density.

Cool.

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
aaron_sK
Member


Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 8834
Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton

1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thumbs up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue89
Member


Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 3482
Location: Bellingham/Eugene

1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kinda? MAF measures the amount of air directly. Very accurate. Speed Density systems calculate the amount of air by measuring temperature, pressure, o2, and throttle position. If any of those sensors goes bad, the whole system goes into band-aid mode. Plus if you make changes to the intake system or port/polish or anything, you should readjust the ecm because the system is more efficient (drawing more air = lean). MAF is better, but SD offers more flexibility for changes in intake design and is more robust.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dewey316
The Lama


Joined: 08 Jan 2004
Posts: 7295
Location: Bringing the tech

1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wouldn't say either is better.

Speed Density, calculates the VE of hte engine, based on tables that relate calculated engine load (via map sensor) and then compares that to RMP's to determine the pulse width for the injectors. MAF's advantage is directly reading air-flow. Now, there is a draw back, it has to add a set ammount of fuel at that air flow.

SD has an advantage of being able to measure possitive pressure, so it works great for applications that have boost. Even OEM systems that used MAF on turbo applications, added a MAP sensor, to use a hybrid SD system for adding fuel under boost.

I wouldn't say either is better, the key is picking the one you can work with in your application.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
90droptoproc
Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 490


1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

still got this if anyone is interested
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cascade Crew Forum Index -> For Sale All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group