| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
90droptoproc Member
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 490
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: 90-92 speed density tpi intake ducting |
|
|
needed one for my car, ended up with two by mistake
anyone need one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danked Banned
Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 278 Location: Toppenish, Wa
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i might take, how much? _________________ Towed amaro, 2nd engine blown spent $1500 not spending more. Decided not worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it won't fit your car danked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
90droptoproc Member
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 490
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ya this one only fits V8's sorry |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
this would fit an LT1 tho huh?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
90droptoproc Member
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 490
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
should fit, but check with some of the more LT1 inteligent peoples on the site  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why would you need it for LT1? LT1's need elbows.
I, however, might be interested. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you sure you need an elbow for an LT1? you could run the air thru the snorkles.
What years LT1's are SD and what years are MAF? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought they were all maf?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I just checked 92-93 LT1's were SD, 94 was the switch to MAF. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I know mine is maf, its in my backyard! Right now tho, the intake goes straight over and draws from the driver side and has the nasty little intake resonance horn thing as well as some turns in the intake to accomodate. I wouldn't mind moving the MAF so it can use a dual snorkle intake. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, a little off topic.....just because I always wondered
What's the difference between Speed Density and Mass Air Flow induction systems? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Hasse Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2005 Posts: 4379 Location: Bremerton, WA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MAF: wire in intake duct (before throttle) with voltage running through it. More air = different temp = voltage change, so the ECU knows how much air is coming into the engine.
MAP = sensor in the intake that measures pressure. Voltage changes from that sensor essentially do the same thing as with a MAF.
*Edit: Al beat me to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That cleared it up a little. I think I more or less get the jist.
One take air speed and temp that the motor is taking in through the throttle body---Mass Air Flow
The other mesures the pressure of the air coming through the upper plenum and adjusts how much fuel to inject into the motor accordingly---Speed Density.
Cool. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kinda? MAF measures the amount of air directly. Very accurate. Speed Density systems calculate the amount of air by measuring temperature, pressure, o2, and throttle position. If any of those sensors goes bad, the whole system goes into band-aid mode. Plus if you make changes to the intake system or port/polish or anything, you should readjust the ecm because the system is more efficient (drawing more air = lean). MAF is better, but SD offers more flexibility for changes in intake design and is more robust. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't say either is better.
Speed Density, calculates the VE of hte engine, based on tables that relate calculated engine load (via map sensor) and then compares that to RMP's to determine the pulse width for the injectors. MAF's advantage is directly reading air-flow. Now, there is a draw back, it has to add a set ammount of fuel at that air flow.
SD has an advantage of being able to measure possitive pressure, so it works great for applications that have boost. Even OEM systems that used MAF on turbo applications, added a MAP sensor, to use a hybrid SD system for adding fuel under boost.
I wouldn't say either is better, the key is picking the one you can work with in your application. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
90droptoproc Member
Joined: 25 Jan 2005 Posts: 490
1989 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
still got this if anyone is interested _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|