| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bejitto101 New Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Bremerton
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:31 pm Post subject: Tranny Question |
|
|
| This is an easy question I would assume. Would a automatic tranny from 1994 Chevy Camaro 3.4l v6 work in my 1989 Firebird 2.8l v6? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Hasse Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2005 Posts: 4379 Location: Bremerton, WA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since the 3.4L is pretty much a drop in replacement for both the 2.8L and the 3.1L, the tranny should work too. _________________ 92 Camaro
89 Camaro
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Depends on how the trans is controlled. I know in some vans in '93 the line pressures were already being controlled by the ECM.
If the trans has 4 wires and is a 700R4 then you might try it. If it's got more than 4 wires, then definitely no. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Hasse Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2005 Posts: 4379 Location: Bremerton, WA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks Paul, I forgot something may be up with the ECM. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91camaro_rs Member

Joined: 03 Dec 2008 Posts: 1712 Location: Fox Island, Wa
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i thought the 4th gens used the 4L60e? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91camaro_rs wrote: | | i thought the 4th gens used the 4L60e? |
I believe the 93-95's got a 4L60 (700R4). _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quasi-Traction wrote: | | 91camaro_rs wrote: | | i thought the 4th gens used the 4L60e? |
I believe the 93-95's got a 4L60 (700R4). |
Still a different trans. It's based on a 700 though. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bejitto101 New Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Bremerton
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So basically when I go to the junk yard to take a look, if it has more than 4 wires, its a no go? I'm looking into one that Kitsap Truck and Auto in Port Orchard has because its the closest tranny for my car. Closest auto tranny out of a third gen is in Kent. Unless someone here has one they're willing to sell.
I'm also planning on getting a 3.4l v6 out of a 94 bird, but that's out in Shelton. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bejitto101 New Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Bremerton
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So the 4L60e is a no go but the 700r4 will work? Sorry, when it cars I'm a noob, just trying to learn so I can fix my bird up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bejitto101 wrote: | | So the 4L60e is a no go but the 700r4 will work? Sorry, when it cars I'm a noob, just trying to learn so I can fix my bird up. |
Correct. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|