 |
Cascade Crew Message Forums
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: The next thing my car will need |
|
|
Well, like a teenager, I am once again getting ahead of myself. Once my engine is in and running, stick a Summit version of the 6AL (Mostly for the rev limiter) and then Its time to focus on chassis stuff.
Ok, first of all, remember when I first joined in may or june, how little I knew about engines? I know less about suspension. Please use small words, lol.
I know the passenger side of my front end is JACKED UP. When I bought the car the wheels were chewed up in one spot because the guy hit a pot hole or a curb at 40 or so. I took it in to be aligned, and they said it couldn't be done, the strut was bent. Tony also pointed out that my springs are way worn out. I believe it, and I think that is why I keep dragging my chin piece SO BADLY. If I am going to do anything with this stuff, I want to replace all the wear parts, and get this thing to handle the same as the stock IROCs did from the factory, or better.
I dont want to lower the car....
Are adjustable struts worth the money? I mean, I am going to run stiff springs, but If I can soften it up for a date, then cool. I just dont want to spend money on it if I wont see a noticeable difference between stiff and soft. Umm, how stiff is stiff?
(Please remember, I have never been in a really fast car that is up to snuff, if this engine swap goes as planned, it will be the second fastest car I have ever been in)
The back suspension wont be hard, I have already pulled the rear end out and replaced it, so I am confident on that. What about the front? I have heard its a real PIA. I mean, can I use Vice Grips to compress the springs?
What is a "Wonder Bar"? Is that the thing that goes from one strut tower to the other? How much does it cost, what does it do, and where is the best place to get one?
SFC, someone at cows said they took it to a body shop, had them straighten the frame, then weld in custom ones. All I see when I picture this is $$$. Cash is short, as always. I can get my father to help me weld them in, but that involves pulling up my carpet? That doesn't thrill me, because in my experience, interiors dont always go back together right, Im also afraid of what kind of rust might be down there.
Sway bars, what size are the ones that come on a 1991 RS? The rear should be stock for an 87 GTA (Came with the rear end) and I have the front one of a very early third gen Z28 sitting in the garage. How big should it be, and how do I measure?
Because I dont know ANYTHING about this stuff, I cant even hardly look over summit and price stuff, because I dont know what any of it is....
Suspension for dummys? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| oh, and steering boxs, I would love to go to a smaller ratio steering box, I dont know if they sell them, where to get them, how much, ect. I just know when I am power sliding, it would be great to not have to turn the wheel so many times! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:00 am Post subject: Re: The next thing my car will need |
|
|
| STEEL wrote: |
What is a "Wonder Bar"? Is that the thing that goes from one strut tower to the other? How much does it cost, what does it do, and where is the best place to get one? |
A wonder bar goes along the bottom front of the frame near the core support. These cars had problems with the steering boxes fracturing the frames and pulling them apart on frequent hard cornering. The wonderbar just creates extra bracing against lateral forces.
best bet is to look for an IROC in the junkyard that has it, Ebay, or TGO. You could potentially build your own too, with a piece of Tube or round stock and a couple pieces of thick sheet or thin plate. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 8:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
First, is it the strut, or the body that is bent?
Struts. Ive never had adjustable, they cost a ton! But if you stick with stock rate springs, then just stick with stock struts since money is tight.
Front springs, no you can not compress them with vicegrips. I have installed so many I no longer use a compressor(except silivrados!). But I do not recommend this, I'm sure some day it will be the fate of me. You can rent the tool usually with a deposit for the price(30 bux?). Get your money back when you return the tool.
Wonder bar has been posted already. However, Topdownsolutions.com sells one that is very cheap in price, and good quality.
SFC is considered a "must" for these cars. And yes, the frame needs to be strait first!! If you only do half the welds needed for spohns, you can do it with carpet in. To do all, you dont even have to pull the seats, just the door lip, and have someone hold the carpet back while someone else welds.
Swaybars. Install the one to suit your use and driving style. Bigger is not always better. I have the largest rear and I pull a tire up when cornoring...not good!! Fronts are usually 30hallow,32hallow,34hallow, 34solid, 36hallow. Rears 19,21,22,24... all solids. What car came with what is pointless now as old as these are. You measure the diameter, in the middle flattest section.
Ive done alot of work on my suspension, and have done lots of custom low rider trucks. If you got questions, ask. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First off. The KYB adjustables are probably not what you are looking for. You are not really going to change the ride much with adjustable shocks/struts. Most of the "harshness" is going to be based on the jounce wheel rate. your springs will set this, the KYB adjustables make a larger adjustment in rebound dampening, the bump is changed, but you probably won't make much of a noticable diffrence.
I think if you want a more managable project, and a better outcome, we need to take three or four steps back for a moment.
Lets start with answering a few basic questions.
1) What is the use of the car you want. IE, do you want straightline traction, or do you want it to handle like it is on rails, or do you want a street car, with a descent ride, or do you want a street car, with a rough ride, that you can toss around corners. Are you planning to auto-x or race the car at all, if so the class you want to race in, will define the modifications you can do.
2) What is the actual budget we are working off of. Is $800 the absolute max that can be spent now, or is that $800 now, then in 3 months, you will be willing to spend more. You need a solid plan of attack, and knowing your current budget, and future budget plans helps.
3) Realisticly do you have the ability/desire to do all the work.
Now, here is the thing with suspensions, it is a big game of trade-offs. Race cars aren't comfortable, comfortable cars aren't fast. You don't get the best of both worlds, that just isn't the case. You compromise between the two extremes and find a balance that you are happy with. There also aren't adjustable parts that are going to make the car go back and forth between the two extremes. Adjustable parts are designed as a tuning aid to get the most performance, they don't make your car a transformer.
There are a few of us here, who know a LOT about suspensions, and making these cars handle. So, lets step back from the shopping list for a few minutes (we will get there), and lets start looking a plan and goals, from there we can zoom in and look at more details, and then get to a shopping list.
--John _________________
"Ever see a Motorcycle in front of a Psychiatrists Office?" Me neither |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I dont want to say that Im setting up the car for drifting, more like Im setting it up for power sliding. Something on the harsh side of a street car would be great. So adjustable isnt what I want? I am young, and a harsh ride isnt going to break my heart. I can handle a few less "Comfort" things.
I want to go budget, and the less it cost, the less time it will take for me to get my money together. I dont want to have it be crap though.... $800 isnt the absolute max, but I dont want to exited it by too much.
I love to learn how to do this stuff myself, and I cant imagine paying someone else to do it for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| STEEL wrote: | | Well, I dont want to say that Im setting up the car for drifting, more like Im setting it up for power sliding. Something on the harsh side of a street car would be great. |
What do you mean by this? What we should probably do, is let you ride in a few of our cars, my car is a completely diffrent beast than say mikes or pauls car. Maybe getting to ride in a couple of our cars, would help you pick a level of "harshness", I think my car is comfortable, but at the same time, when Tony rode in mine, he comment on how much harsher it was than his WS6. So this can get real subjective.
As for the powersliding, that isn't so much a suspension thing, you drive the wheels off a car, and stand on the throttle the tail will slide out. Balancing a car for handling well will help you in balancing a slide, that really isn't a goal though, I read in to that, as you want to set the car up for some handling, you aren't building a straight-line based car. Would that sum it up?
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| YES! Thats what I meant, exactly. I dont think a harsh ride will bother me though, one thing I hate is how much you can feel the front end go up and down while I shift.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well the lifting on shifting is a few things, part of it is suspension geometry, some of it is spring rates, some of it is shocks, and some just won't be avoided.
Wanting to keep stock ride height, is going to really limit your options in springs, and honestly none of them are all that great IMHO. The other option you would have, is to get a weight jack setup like I have, from ground-control, but that would blow most of your budget.
BUT, Job #1, is going to be fixing what is broke, you can upgrade all you want, but 1 bad part ruins the whole thing. If you arm/lca/panhard/swaybar/strut-mounts are worn, you will need to replace those bushings. That is vital to getting this car to be fun to drive. I think I would scrap that bushing kit you have listed. Look at what you need, and get those individualy. A few of those things you may not want to replace the bushings on, you may want a whole new peice (like the panhard....).
Since you are looking right now at stock ride height, I would keep your springs or get some used IROC springs or WS6 springs. That will save you some coin, and honestly I see no reason to waste the money on stock replacement springs. If you were looking to lower it an 1", then something like the Eibach pro-kit would be good.
So, also, get under the car and measure the sway-bars, see what you have. If you have a 32mm-34mm, you are probably set, find a 23mm-24mm rear bar, and leave the front bar. that is going to help give the car a little more neutral ballance that the stocker setup, if you leave the front bar alone, and give it just a little more rear bar.
Where you want to spend your money, is in good shocks/struts. That is what is going to make the biggest single diffrence. If you had the budget for it, I would really suggest Koni's, but I think they are about $700 for the set, and that wouldn't leave you with much. Although I might still consider it if I were you. Get new a-arm bushings, used IROC springs, a rear sway bar, and koni's, that is about $800. Then spend some extra money to replace some bushings, tie-rods, etc, and you would have a descent setup.
The SFC, STB, LCA's, Panhard are all nice, but probably aren't critical. If you can afford a tubular Panhard, I would do that, as it is the lateral support peice for the rear end. The SFC's again, are a very good modification, and one you are likely going to want to do, but with so much other stuff, probably not where I would start. With the budget you have I think I would concentrate on fixing the front suspension, and shocks, then find a few used parts, and go from there. I think I have been quoted as saying this several times before. When I had nothing but factory RS springs, bigger sway bars, and shocks on my car, it was the most fun I have had in it. Sure it wasn't as fast as it is now, I have a lot more grip now, but it was perfectly balanced, and SO easy to drive at the limit. You might want to really consider going that route, and then adding on later as your driving skills, and budget grow.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I believe my car is already sitting a little lower than stock. When I get out of the RS and get into the Z28, I notice the difference in height. If I was to lower the car an inch or so, it would probably be right where it is now. Will this make a big difference for driving? Is it a more cost effective way to increase the cornering? I mean, I have to cross the tracks twice and then go over two speed bumps everyday on my way to school, then do it again on the way home. I already occasionally drag the cat or the air dam thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
83Z28BlackBetty Bam-Ba-Lam

Joined: 13 Mar 2006 Posts: 2083 Location: Aloha
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
john, may we all learn from your infinite wisdom.
He gives good advice, learn from him.
you are welcome to go for a ride in betty sometime and see how she feels. I did a budget suspension rebuild and i LOVE IT! it is no way like john's machine but she handles great!
I put in a set of ws6 springs, a new set of kyb gas shocks, 36mm front swaybar and 24mm rear, and new tierods. it now turns when i want it, grips tight, and feels really stiff in and out of corners. great handling for cheap.
~JAKE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dewey is correct on that stuff. Ive also seen him and Dean go at it with others on TGO.
I will just say IMO for hard cornoring, 24mm rear bar is to much on stock'ish rate springs. But how much are you really hard cornoring?
On your parts list, swaybar MOUNT bushings are not in that kit.
Adjustable tube panhard bar as well(as Dewey said). You can go double heim on that and it wont make your ride harsh at all. You kill your ride going double heim on the LCA's.
Tq arm has also not been mentioned. But the more sold on this you go, the more you get the "front lifting" feel. Also, the more power and low gears you go, the more it lifts. It also changes your handling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STEEL Member
Joined: 22 May 2007 Posts: 417
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | Dewey is correct on that stuff. Ive also seen him and Dean go at it with others on TGO.
I will just say IMO for hard cornoring, 24mm rear bar is to much on stock'ish rate springs. But how much are you really hard cornoring?
On your parts list, swaybar MOUNT bushings are not in that kit.
Adjustable tube panhard bar as well(as Dewey said). You can go double heim on that and it wont make your ride harsh at all. You kill your ride going double heim on the LCA's.
Tq arm has also not been mentioned. But the more sold on this you go, the more you get the "front lifting" feel. Also, the more power and low gears you go, the more it lifts. It also changes your handling. | So much of what you said is totally and completely lost on me. I think I need to do some studying on this stuff, save some cash, then come back to it. I need to do SFC first it sounds like, then come back to suspension when I have some money to spend, and maybe a place to work. In order to do bushings/anything else, I need to re-align the steering, and I dont want to do that more than once =\ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | Dewey is correct on that stuff. Ive also seen him and Dean go at it with others on TGO.
I will just say IMO for hard cornoring, 24mm rear bar is to much on stock'ish rate springs. But how much are you really hard cornoring?
On your parts list, swaybar MOUNT bushings are not in that kit.
Adjustable tube panhard bar as well(as Dewey said). You can go double heim on that and it wont make your ride harsh at all. You kill your ride going double heim on the LCA's.
Tq arm has also not been mentioned. But the more sold on this you go, the more you get the "front lifting" feel. Also, the more power and low gears you go, the more it lifts. It also changes your handling. |
He's saying a 24mm diameter sway bar on the back he thinks is too much for stock springs. They have a lbs/square inch rating called spring rate. Low spring rates are softer springs.
Adjustable panhard is the bar that connects from one side of the differential to the frame. IT keeps the rear end centered when you make a corner. Adjustable means you can move the rear right or left to adjust and make it centered.
A heim joint is a spherical rod end. Instead of a rubber bushing you have this:
Which allows for more rotation of the shaft. No binding. They are also adjustable(see the threads?)
Rod ends on the LCA's don't make for a harsh ride. I had energy suspension Poly bushings in my LCA's and went to spherical ends for all 4 joints and the only thing I noticed was no more binding in corners.
I wouldn't worry about the torque arm for now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| STEEL wrote: | | So much of what you said is totally and completely lost on me. I think I need to do some studying on this stuff, save some cash, then come back to it. I need to do SFC first it sounds like, then come back to suspension when I have some money to spend, and maybe a place to work. In order to do bushings/anything else, I need to re-align the steering, and I dont want to do that more than once =\ |
I'd stay with fixing what is bent or broken in the front suspension before messing with SFCs. And before the SFCs, like Dew said get shocks, bushings, or worn out parts (ie, tie rods, ball joints, etc).
Do you want to ride in my bird? I've gone through the suspension a little bit and you can see where you want to go. _________________
| Quote: | | Sometimes I actually think I'm slightly retarded in the mouth. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Al Hasse Member

Joined: 19 Nov 2005 Posts: 4379 Location: Bremerton, WA
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| STEEL wrote: | | In order to do bushings/anything else, I need to re-align the steering, and I dont want to do that more than once =\ |
Go find a shop that offers lifetime alignments, there's a Firestone store here in Bremerton that does. Pay for the equivalent of 3 (maybe more) alignments up front, then all others are free for as long as you own the car. Then play with those parts and get an alignment each time. _________________ 92 Camaro
89 Camaro
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iansane Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2004 Posts: 5742 Location: Bothell
1991 Pontiac Trans Am
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I almost forgot about the lifetime alignments. The firestone out here in tacoma on 6th ave has sales on that almost every month. Get it for $120 out the door. Only problem is they only do exact stock specs. Unless you can get friendly with the techs or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
91RSVert Member
Joined: 16 May 2007 Posts: 2736 Location: AR
1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks twilight.
I went from stock LCA's to double heim and it is night n day difference.
Steel,
Right now go and get new mounts and endlinks for the swaybars. Get the wonderbar.
If your shocks/struts are currently worn out, go replace them.
Then I would go with the SFC's.
Then start saving to go all out with new control arm bushings, panhard, springs, strut mounts, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 91RSVert wrote: | | I will just say IMO for hard cornoring, 24mm rear bar is to much on stock'ish rate springs. But how much are you really hard cornoring? |
I generaly agree, especialy at auto-x. BUT, in the case of a stock sprung car, upping the rear sway bar like that, helps to get the car to rotate. It might not be as good at putting hte power down coming out of slow corners, but it will have a much nicer feel on turn-in and mid corner. For someone just starting out, with a very limited budget, it is a quick and dirty way to make the car a little more neutral. He can change that out when he gets some higher rate springs, and can do it the right way and balance the car out.
Steel. I think what almost all of us are getting at here. Is that you need to fix whats not in good working order first. Don't start modifitying things, until you have all the problems fixed. Sure as you are fixing problems, you can put in upgraded peices (it is a perfect time to upgrade stuff, if you have to replace it anyway). You would also be suprised how much of a diffrence a more performance oriented alignment will go. When you get to the point of having it aligned, let us know, we can give you some specs that seem to work well on our cars.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|