| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:13 pm Post subject: To balance a 383? |
|
|
So, the question, is internal or external balance.
I lean towards internal, but I'd like to hear the pros/cons of both. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Internal. I don't know why you would want to deal with an external balance, if you are building the motor. IIRC you can also run a lot smaller balancer with an internal, so that is rotating mass savings.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you go internal you can even use your current balancer and flywheel. Otherwise you'll be buying both. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If you run an external balance and have to change flywheels/balancers for some reason, you'll never get it balanced as well without having the full rotating assembly out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| internal if you can afford it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chevymad wrote: | | If you go internal you can even use your current balancer and flywheel. Otherwise you'll be buying both. |
lol, well since my inner/outer hubs came apart on the balancer, I'll be needing a new one...Time to get an SFI approved piece! _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cool.
Consensus seems to be internal balance.
Guess I'll start pricing bottom end assemblies. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thought you didn't care about SFI? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My goal with the car is mostly Street/strip. Handling is nice, but that'll will have to come later on.
power goal is 370hp to the ground. I'd like to be able to spin it up to 6k consistantly and know it's going to be fine. Nitros is a very good possibility, so i"m torn between a possibly a cast crank, cast rods, and Hypertecutic pistons or an all forged bottom end.
Although the forged stuff sounds nice..., if I go all forged I"m already $1500 into it, and I'm trying to keep this build, when all's said and done around $3000.
Here's a little shopping list I've compiled so far:
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=ESP%2D13054L030&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=SCA%2D1%2D91305BIE&autoview=sku
when I moved my harddrive over to my new computer, I think I lost my DCR calculator, so I haven't had a chance to compute where each would put me. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dewey316 The Lama

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If nitrous/forced induction is in your future, spend the couple hundred dollars extra and get at least forged pistons. It looks like both kits come with forged I-beams, so you should be ok there, as long as you don't go crazy with the revs. I would talk to Brandon about crank material though, I don't know how a cast crank will hold up. The longer stroke has a lot more leverage on the crank than the smaller stroke does. Considering the cost of having to build this a 2nd time, I think I would want to do the forged setup now, but if money is an issue, it may not be an option.
--John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quasi-Traction "I have petals"

Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 3873 Location: stumptown
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I can get what I want for my 2001 camaro, I'll have a little bit of money to spare, so I'd go with the forged bottom end. However, I have to be able to afford building the 383, and have money left over for daily transportation too.
I would agree too John, Build it once--build it right. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|