| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:56 pm Post subject: Needing a little help |
|
|
So I pulled the heads off of my car today so that I can get the valve guides replaced. I was finally able to measure how deep the piston is in the hole.
I have this
Chamber - 64cc
Head gasket .040"
Piston in hole .045"
4 valve reliefs 6cc
This gives me an 8.22 to 1 compression ratio.
Since I can't do anything about the piston in hole measurement I was thinking about running a .015" head gasket which would at least help the quench and bump the compression up to 8.7. Anybody have any experience with the thin gaskets?
Also I had two exhaust valves that are so bad that they are about 1/16th" smaller in diameter than the rest, the face on them is shaped like a cup with a ridge around the edge. They were still sealing though.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In conjunction with a smaller head gasket, you could have some head work done (i.e. oversized valves, pocket porting), and have the heads shaved for trueness, which would bump the compression ratio a tad as well.
Remember though that your cam will effect your compression ratio, there's a difference between static and dynamic compression ratio  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Go ahead and run the shim gaskets Rod. I beleive Paul allready is running them, and i've got a set on my 454 too. Just spray them with coppercoat before you put them on. A slight mill on the heads wouldnt hurt anything, but won't fix your quench problem. If you go too high on the compression with that wide a quench, you'll be pinging. Almost sucked 2 valves eh? That kinda sucks. On the positive side.. you'll be getting a few more ponies! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Right on!
Hopefully I'll have time this week to look for a machine shop that I like. Get these things back on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Schultzy89GTA M.R.A. (11sec Club)

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 4417 Location: Gresham, OR
1989 Pontiac GTA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leave the CR where it is at and boost it
-Schultzy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Schultzy89GTA wrote: | Leave the CR where it is at and boost it
-Schultzy |
I wonder if my pickup will still run if I steal the turbo off of it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rod.... Are you sure your pistons are 6cc? I have flat tops with 4 reliefs and it's 8.65. Also, what's the bore of your head gasket?
With the rest of your specs and a 30 over 350 I come up with:
At 6cc and 4.125 bore
9.25:1
With 8.65 CC pistons:
9.05:1
With 4.1 bore and 6cc pistons
9.26:1
With 4.1 bore and 8.65cc pistons:
9.02:1
With a .015 steel shim 4.1 Bore Felpro-1094:
9.52.
Dynamic compression with your cam:
7.7:1
You're right there to run on 87/89 octane if you stick the steel shim in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | Rod.... Are you sure your pistons are 6cc? I have flat tops with 4 reliefs and it's 8.65. Also, what's the bore of your head gasket?
With the rest of your specs and a 30 over 350 I come up with:
At 6cc and 4.125 bore
9.25:1
With 8.65 CC pistons:
9.05:1
With 4.1 bore and 6cc pistons
9.26:1
With 4.1 bore and 8.65cc pistons:
9.02:1
With a .015 steel shim 4.1 Bore Felpro-1094:
9.52.
Dynamic compression with your cam:
7.7:1
You're right there to run on 87/89 octane if you stick the steel shim in. |
6 cc on the pistons is the number that I came across at Summit for Speedpro flat tops. I'm not sure that it is correct. Head gasket should be 4.1" bore. Remember that my 350 is still standard 4.000 bore. With the pistons that far down and the regular head gasket I have .085" quench. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
That with 6cc pistons puts you at : 9.158:1.
I put the bore in the calculator as 4.002 (Was told by my machine shop when you hone it for rings it takes about 2 thou off.)
That shim gasket will then put you at 9.69:1.
Make sure you check and check and check the deck height. Check different pistons too... if you haven't already. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Twilightoptics wrote: | That with 6cc pistons puts you at : 9.158:1.
I put the bore in the calculator as 4.002 (Was told by my machine shop when you hone it for rings it takes about 2 thou off.)
That shim gasket will then put you at 9.69:1.
Make sure you check and check and check the deck height. Check different pistons too... if you haven't already. |
I'm confused now. To determine the comp ratio I added up the volumes for,,,
Chamber - 64cc
Quench - 17.52cc
Piston - 6cc
Total chamber 87.52cc
cylinder disp. 717.34 cc
Divide chamber by displacement right?
8.2 CR with regular gaskets
8.7 CR with .015 gaskets
I sure hope I'm wrong about this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I see that your calculator ads the chamber volume to the displacement, then divides it by the chamber volume. How can the cylinder pull in more air NA than the actual displacement?
That same math would put your engine at 10.2 CR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigDaddyVu 12sec Club

Joined: 31 Jan 2004 Posts: 1118 Location: Spokane, Wa
1986 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Right on!
I was wrong in how I was figuring that.
So is 9.7 too high? Should I just put it back the way it was? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think 10:1 is supposed to be the limit with iron heads. I'd probably still run the steel shim just to get the quench better. Ever calculate your DCR? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul said the DCR was 7.7 to 1. I'm pretty content to agree with him at this point.
New problem though, tonight I started looking at the bores close and have a scratch/gouge in #6 that I can catch my fingernail on. Ends right at the top of the wear area like a ring is stuck and scratching the cylinder wall. Not sure what to do about it at this point.
Anybody seen any good buys on 6.0 pickup engines lately? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sellmanb Member
Joined: 30 Nov 2004 Posts: 727 Location: Tigard, OR
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: |
Anybody seen any good buys on 6.0 pickup engines lately? |
If you're talking about the Gen 3/4 6.0l engines, then I would strongly suggest heads/cam for any type of performance platform... they are complete dogs... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yes.... we are suggesting cam.
The heads I thought were still pretty okay? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The escalade engine is the one you really want. Beleive they're 345 to start with and a cam/intake/chip change add another 125. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blue89 Member

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't the escalade engine an LS7 in disguse?
My friend got me thinking of a 2004 RWD Northstar engine. I really think that my next swap might be a turbo charged 350.
-t |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|