View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:22 am Post subject: Alum heads sbc/ am I all wrong ???? |
|
|
Iam looking at Brodax and Dart heads
I want to turn our new motor above 6,500 rpms. Maybe to 8,000 rpm max
So the 220cc heads, or 230cc would do it, these heads would make 50+ more HP at 7,000 RPM. It's a trade off but we want the high end horse power. I don't think we will notice a difference in low-end torque compared to what we have now.
These heads are running from $1,000 to $2,000 bucks.\
I would like your thought on some serious aluminum heads and runner size, 200, 220, 230, ????
And what are you running as far as heads, and do you like? What would you do different?
Thanks
Scott
Last edited by scott in wa. on Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:11 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)
Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I was going to get aluminums... which WILL be my next head purchase.
I'd get the brand new CNC Brodix KC IK 210s. They flow like MOTHERS!
I'd get em bare and have a reputable shop AKA chevymad, put in my hardware.
I have Iron Pro Topline's right now and I've had nothing but trouble with them and they don't put out the power they should. Plus side is they have fat decks so you can mill them and lots of extra material for porting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blue89 Member
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 3482 Location: Bellingham/Eugene
1986 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott in wa. Member
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 660 Location: puyallup wa.
1988 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:33 am Post subject: well |
|
|
It depends on how much rpms you can turn with the lower end, and of course, you have to have a short block built with RPMS power in mind.
But.
What I have been reading is.
The bigger the runners, the higher rpms you are able to run, with a large increase in horse power in the upper range.
So say you had a built 383, with alum heads 200 cc runners you wouldn't have as much horse power at high rpms, BUT you would have more low end torque. Where if you had 230 cc runners you wouldn't have as much torque in the lower end but you would be able to rev the crap out of that motor like 8 + grand, where you would gain a few ponies as long as everything is setup for those rpms...
That’s what I have been reading.
Can some one else chime in????
How about that guy with the 10 sec. 1/4 mile car, he has to be running some big runners if it’s a sbc I suspect.
ahhh
I see
izcain
Modification Trick Flow 23 degree heads CNC'd full ported and polished
I see his peak hp is at 6283.000 must be a torque monster.......
sure is a sweep car
Scott |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Demon 12sec Club
Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
QwkTrip 11sec Club
Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you want serious power then you could do 18 degree heads but it requires other custom features and is probably overkill. For standard heads Trick Flow has a reputation for making power. Frankly, there are a lot of heads out there that will do the job. Spend your money on porting work. That's where you'll get the real power. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Demon 12sec Club
Joined: 09 Jan 2004 Posts: 1189 Location: You're not worthy
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
QwkTrip wrote: | If you want serious power then you could do 18 degree heads but it requires other custom features and is probably overkill. For standard heads Trick Flow has a reputation for making power. Frankly, there are a lot of heads out there that will do the job. Spend your money on porting work. That's where you'll get the real power. |
well he said he wanted high end ...
I'm fairly set on having TEA do my head porting work, they've done some amazing things for the LSx's and to my knowledge are pretty reputable for the traditional SBC head as well |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nathan J Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Posts: 161 Location: spokane
1986 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pfft 32v waste of time just put a sb2.2 set up on and let it go heh. but anyway rpm is not the only thing to look at when picking the cc of a head. a 230cc on a 355 is alot of head for it it better be a 12.1+ engine high lift cam and a carb to even make it worth it. why do you want to spin high rpm?? might as well make the hp down lower and keep the engine togeather longer. i run a ported 200cc head on my 383 i might go bigger bec of the nitrous but thats down the road. a buddy of mine ran afr 227 on his 406sbc but it was a 600hp sb with no bottle all out race engine so really do some research and pick the right head bec if you go to big you will feal the loss in the low end. _________________ 86 firebird
383sbc
th350 t brake
4th gen rear soon 9in ford rear |
|
Back to top |
|
|
QwkTrip 11sec Club
Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 3942 Location: Peoria, IL
1989 Pontiac Firebird
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pffffhhtt to all of you! Street car heaven....
http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html
I looked into these about 8 years ago when I was fresh out of college, living at home, and stupid with my money. Unfortunately, the company refused to make a set for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dewey316 The Lama
Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 7295 Location: Bringing the tech
1990 Chevrolet Camaro RS
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I think we had the coates engine discusion back in the day on TGO. Would be super cool if they ever came out with it for production. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
izcain 9sec Club
Joined: 09 Sep 2006 Posts: 1306 Location: Port Angeles WA
1983 Chevrolet Camaro Z/28
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will admit that my trick flows have given me a ton of problems in the beginning but I took care of all of that after numerous calls to the R&D department of trickflow, trickflow has since combated these issues and are MUCH MUCH better. I ended up taking my heads all apart myself and building them right. Now im not going for 8k plus but I do spin up above 7k from time to time in the 1/4. The dyno I think was a little off compared to my tach. If you wanna build big power I would say go for the 230 range but your going to have to do ALOT to move that amount of air. Mine started out as 195 castings but they are a whole lot more then that now! With the right comparenets and having it dialed in right you can have the potential of making big power out of a smaller runner. _________________
1983 Z28 383 + 201ci more = New Heart for this season!
9.17 @ 148 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|