| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:23 am Post subject: Diesel guys: Got a tech question |
|
|
I'd post this on a proper diesel forum but those guys are too busy comparing their pipes...
Should I expect to see any change (up or down) in fuel mileage when increasing injection timing? This is on my non-turbo IDI engine if it matters. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Generally not much to be gained. I know most rigs, turbo ones I deal with, if you're off a few degrees either way it'll run like shizzle and have crap for power.
Kinda like ECM gas timing.... ECM thinks its at X. If it's not, it throws stuff outta whack. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay that's good, I'm not going nuts then.
When I first swapped the injectors it ran real flat, had no power, and a lot of light grey smoke. Upon reading more I found that replacing injectors on these engines lowers the relative timing (tight new springs in the injectors, but the pump pressure is the same).
I bumped up the timing a bit then, but it hasn't been right. The other day got a wild hare and maxed the timing as far as I could with all the lines still hooked to the pump. That lowered the EGT's under load, darkened up the smoke and gave marginally more power, but the mileage is the same or a shade less than it was.
This thing needs a turbo, or just a CTD.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IROCDave Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 957 Location: Snohomish WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You miss typed that, what your trying to say is DTD (DuraMax Turbo Diesel). Also need an Allison transmission. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I kinda need my truck running, Dave, not broken down with bad injectors or a burnt up turbo.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Says the guy who just changed injectors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | I kinda need my truck running, Dave, not broken down with bad injectors or a burnt up turbo.  |
Dirtymax injectors only crap out with crappy fuel and people who don't replace the fuel filter EVERY oil change.
Hehe and usually it's the turbo speed sensors now days that go out on those. Unfortunately you have to service the turbo as a whole unit last I checked.... even though the speed sensor comes out with 1 bolt. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chevymad wrote: | | Says the guy who just changed injectors. |
I'll defer that to the idiot previous owner who eliminated the water separator. Although I have to take partial responsibility since it took me a year to crawl under there and look for it.
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | people who don't replace the fuel filter EVERY oil change. |
They don't have a big ol' spin-on filter like everything else does? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevymad Master B
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 5476
1987 Pontiac Formula
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ford and chevy are both cartridge fuel filters I think now.
Though last duramax I did was a spin on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dirty max are spin on. And the fuel water sep is the main fuel filter. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just find a stock 93-94 turbo setup cheap. I lost the 7.3 in my 93 with the factory turbo and replaced it with a 6.9 that my dad had. Put the turbo injection pump and injectors on it and it is pretty freakin strong. Not like my powerstroke but deffinately alot more power than NA.
Also, LOL at a pyrometer on a NA diesel.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rjmcgee wrote: | Also, LOL at a pyrometer on a NA diesel.  |
Plannin' ahead, Rod.
With the timing retarded I could put my foot into it and hit 1200* pretty easily. Now that it's back where it should be I have to be into it on the right grade or with a bit of a load. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjmcgee The Hammer

Joined: 08 Jan 2004 Posts: 2328
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | | chevymad wrote: | | Says the guy who just changed injectors. |
I'll defer that to the idiot previous owner who eliminated the water separator. Although I have to take partial responsibility since it took me a year to crawl under there and look for it.
| Twilightoptics wrote: | | people who don't replace the fuel filter EVERY oil change. |
They don't have a big ol' spin-on filter like everything else does? |
Those 83-86 water separators are a pain in the ass. Almost all of them I have seen have been bypassed. I ran my 89 100,000 miles without a separtator and fueling out of a pack tank in the bed. That was only because I was cheap and used a 6.9 filter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aaron_sK Member
Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 8834 Location: Back in beautiful Tacompton
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I bought a great big NAPA water separator/filter and mounted it on the fender. I spliced into the factory line down where the old separator was and ran hardline up to the new one. Seems to work great.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IROCDave Member
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 957 Location: Snohomish WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| aaron_sK wrote: | I kinda need my truck running, Dave, not broken down with bad injectors or a burnt up turbo.  |
It is a known problem with the Lb7's. The rest of the engine is solid and each iteration was more reliable.
As far as changing the fuel filters every 3- 5 K, it doesnt matter. From what I have gleaned from Duramx foums it has more to do with the AC voltage than anything else. The later model engines reduced the voltage from (IIRC?) 48V to 24V to 12V. Guys with aftermarket fuel filters still experienced injector failures. The rate of failures is not baised on miles, hours or filtration. No ryme or reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilightoptics Hardcore (12sec Club)

Joined: 13 Jan 2004 Posts: 9191 Location: Auburn , WA
1987 Chevrolet Camaro IROC-Z
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
The injector failures we deal with are excessive return rates most of the time. Not electrical failures.
It's crap getting into the injector and now alowing the plungers and stuff inside to do their job, so alot of the pressure ends up on the return side and thus you have an injector that is way under fueling. _________________ A redline a day keeps the carbon away! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|